Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sorry is that the only one I am allowed to prove now that you have moved the goalposts? Stop arguing in bad faith.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You legit just claimed that healthcare arguments are not based in fact. How are they not based in fact and empirical reality?

Expand.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You made the original claim that one side's arguments were fact-based and the others were not, ERGO, the burden of proof is on you. Demonstrate why lib arguments are based in fact, and con arguments are not. You have to prove this about every single argument I listed, accounting for every argument used by both sides for or against them.

I'm really just asking questions, and you're refusing to answer them.

Your move, king.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You're going very far to avoid admitting you tossed healthcare in there without thinking about it and have no idea how to expand on or explain your claim.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I could explain that health care debate in the US is primarily built on emotional arguments

but you are just trying to avoid the overall point by dragging us into the reeds like you always do. So I am just going to pretend you are correct and I was wrong. Sorry, Pizzashill, you were right about one of my multiple examples.

So with that out of the way, here is where you miscalculated: you don't win when you fixate your ADHD on 1 out of 5 bad examples in the argument and ignore everything else you r-slur. Now it's your turn to explain to me how there is not a single lib argument out there re: abortion that is NOT rooted in FACTS and LOGIC. You have, on your own, in the past, stated that libs make delusional arguments in the abortion debate.

Or gun control, which I'm pretty sure you don't even agree with libs on, though it's been a while since I heard you talk about it and your stance on that seems pretty dynamic.

Or illegal immigration, which is entirely built on emotional arguments.

You also completely ignored what I said about climate change. Why? Does it take too many brain folds to make sense of that?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ok here let's try this.

Does the US spend more, for worse healthcare outcomes?

No I fully plan to move on to the others after we establish how dumb you are on this one.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ok here let's try this.

:marseypizzashill:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

didn't read

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Shocking.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.