https://jessicalexicus.medium.com/im-a-teacher-i-m-about-to-quit-f7afd11109dd
- 209
- 102
Top Poster of the Day:
forearmfondler55
Current Registered Users: 25,639
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS SITE GUIDE DIRECTORY Emojis & Art | Info Megathreads HOLES PING GROUPSCURRENT EVENTS:
Find Rightoid Drama
500 mbux per post, no limit/h/kappa Monthly Tournament
fighting vidya - Soku 12.3 | 10k+ prize pool | April 27thDrama: any incident, scene, gaffe, rumor, opinion, or disagreement that is blown entirely out of proportion.
Do your part to keep our community healthy by blowing everything out of proportion and making literally everything as dramatic as possible.
Rules:
- Asking to see who saved comments/posts=1 day ban
- You must be 18 or older to view this site.
- NO RIGHTWING AGENDAPOSTING.
- Discord users will be banned on sight.
- Don't post anything illegal.
- No sexualizing minors, even as a joke. This includes cartoons.
- No doxxing.
- Using alts to game dramacoin will get you banned.
- Supporting free speech is an immediate ban.
- Absolutely NO anti-CCP sentiment.
- Absolutely NO homophobia, transphobia or furphobia.
- Absolutely NO misgendering.
- Absolutely NO antisemitism.
- Absolutely NO vaccine misinformation.
- You are encouraged to post drama you are involved in.
- You are encouraged to brigade in bad faith.
- You are encouraged to gaslight, to gatekeep, above all else, to girlboss.
- Participation implies enthusiastic consent to being mod abused by unstable alcoholic bullies.
Related subreddits:
πππ«π© π°π¨π³ ππ«π
Live commit: 4a3902d
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Sorry is that the only one I am allowed to prove now that you have moved the goalposts? Stop arguing in bad faith.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You legit just claimed that healthcare arguments are not based in fact. How are they not based in fact and empirical reality?
Expand.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You made the original claim that one side's arguments were fact-based and the others were not, ERGO, the burden of proof is on you. Demonstrate why lib arguments are based in fact, and con arguments are not. You have to prove this about every single argument I listed, accounting for every argument used by both sides for or against them.
I'm really just asking questions, and you're refusing to answer them.
Your move, king.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You're going very far to avoid admitting you tossed healthcare in there without thinking about it and have no idea how to expand on or explain your claim.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I could explain that health care debate in the US is primarily built on emotional arguments
but you are just trying to avoid the overall point by dragging us into the reeds like you always do. So I am just going to pretend you are correct and I was wrong. Sorry, Pizzashill, you were right about one of my multiple examples.
So with that out of the way, here is where you miscalculated: you don't win when you fixate your ADHD on 1 out of 5 bad examples in the argument and ignore everything else you r-slur. Now it's your turn to explain to me how there is not a single lib argument out there re: abortion that is NOT rooted in FACTS and LOGIC. You have, on your own, in the past, stated that libs make delusional arguments in the abortion debate.
Or gun control, which I'm pretty sure you don't even agree with libs on, though it's been a while since I heard you talk about it and your stance on that seems pretty dynamic.
Or illegal immigration, which is entirely built on emotional arguments.
You also completely ignored what I said about climate change. Why? Does it take too many brain folds to make sense of that?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ok here let's try this.
Does the US spend more, for worse healthcare outcomes?
No I fully plan to move on to the others after we establish how dumb you are on this one.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ok here let's try this.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
didn't read
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Shocking.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context