I just found a medical research paper that's actually just the author (who is obviously a woman) malding over people who want to ban male circumcision because apparently doing so takes the spotlight away from banning female genital mutilation

I eventually grew to hate Samuel after I heard him having s*x with my sister. I arrived at the house one day, my mother being at work, and heard the sounds of Samuel plunging his peepee into my sister’s vagina through her closed room door, along with my sister’s moans. I stood there and listened to it all. So my sister, who was four years younger than me, managed to lose her virginity before I did. It reminded me of how pathetic I was, that at the age of twenty-two, I was still a virgin. I hated her boyfriend as well. My sister said that he’s been with other girls before her, and I’m sure he lost his virginity at a much younger age. It is such an injustice. The slob doesn’t even have a car, and he is able to get girlfriends, while I drive a BMW and get no attention from any girls whatsoever.

Snapshots:

• reveddit.com
• archive.org
• archive.ph (click to archive)

Baby males peepee shearing "bad", women most affected

simple removal of the male foreskin for health reasons

there are no health reasons. There’s a like 5% increased chance of infection with foreskin if you don’t wash it, but that’s also true of any body part

actually just the author (who is obviously a woman)

literally two authors

one is a man

What do you mean, academia is 99% trash articles that only serve to justify your preconceived notions by giving it "scientific" backing?!

For every valuable scientific article, there's not one, nor ten, but easily a hundred that are completely worthless. There's simply far too many researchers and the pressure to pump papers out is far to strong, so academic rigour has gone completely down the drain.

The average paper is read by a whooping 3 other people, by the way.

It sounds like you're suggesting that this PEER REVIEWED SCIENCE is in some way misleading or false. Surely you're not that dumb. SCIENCE DOESN'T LIE, BIGOT. Do better.

>Author: Elizabeth Pointek

https://i.ibb.co/wrCnCJm/414cb8a3812f.webp

Redditors actually get very angry about circumcision. I'm sure you could just post it on r/science.

Despite the fact that 1 in 3 males currently are circumcised, some controversy remains about the procedure’s medical and social value.

Oh so if we just needlessly chop off the end of a baby's peepee enough times we should be able to dismiss any controversy?

A fricking 'scientist' wrote this and makes a laughably unscientific statement in the first paragraph. I'm an r-slur but once you pass 30 and have a functioning brain you realise that 90% of people are fricking idiots.