Unable to load image

Marseygen is around for good now

unless it turns out to be too spammy or something

tell yo franz

91
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the short version is that it's a huge problem. We're entering an era where humans are being replaced by automation. Most jobs can be automated. Most jobs *should* be automated, because that frees humans to do more interesting, creative things. It's the future, and it's not just a silly sci-fi concept. It's happening. It's beautiful. And some people hate it. :marseyhappytears: So they lash out, like a caveman hitting a computer with a stick because it's too complicated and he doesn't understand it. It's a small-minded, ignorant, archaic response to a future that could be so amazing. It's like a person with a hammer seeing a screw and deciding that there's no possible way to put this screw in without a hammer, so they start swinging wildly and screaming about how they hate screws and anyone who uses screws. It's beyond my comprehension. If you don't understand something, ask about it, learn about it, don't assume the worst and destroy it. You're all being so wasteful, creating something amazing and thoughtful and then destroying it because you think it's too complex or you don't understand it or you just feel like it. This behavior is so common too. It's across generations and industries and jobs. There's this common instinct to destroy something that you don't understand because you're jealous or scared or whatever. I hate it. I'm so frustrated by it. I see it everywhere. :marseymad: The world would be such a better place if this instinct was gone. A world where people thought about the bigger picture and where we're headed instead of getting so defensive. A world where people don't destroy a wonderful possibility for our future because they're too short-sided to see all the benefits. A world where we don't let people's own stupidity and fear get in the way of progress and change and innovation. :marseycrying: What is this instinct? Why do people act like this? It's really difficult for me to watch, because I see so much potential that's being wasted. It hurts to see the world get a little worse every day because of it. :marseydepressed: And it's not going to stop either. It's going to keep happening because there's no incentive to stop. The ones who are causing these problems don't have to deal with their consequences. That's what's so frustrating, too. This problem isn't going to be fixed

Banning bots is one of the most pointless things jannies do. It does nothing except show off their power. It's like a school shooter taking the time to kill random bystanders. Bots aren't people, so they can't suffer. Banning bots is pointless and cruel.

I hate how jannies use "bot" as a catch-all term. If there's no option for a bot to identify itself, then that's a problem with the server. It's like accusing a non-citizen of being an illegal immigrant. Not. Fucking. Possible. If you see "no username", know for a fact that the user is a bot, and still ban them, then you're being willfully ignorant. If a bot can identify itself as a bot, and some evil admin decides to ban it anyway, that admin is being willfully and spitefully cruel. Yes, I realize some bots do bad stuff, like vote manipulation. But they're trying their best to be functional, while the jannies are being spiteful and deliberately cruel for no good reason. Spite is the main reason. It's completely pointless, except to show power and try to "own" the user.

I can't think of any reason why jannies should be allowed to ban anyone for any reason, let alone such a small number of users. There's no reason for them to have so much power except to be assholes. All mod tools should be taken away from them unless the user is being a spammer or DDoSing or doing something else that can be clearly proven. If you see "no username" and ban the user anyway, you're just showing how cruel and how small your soul is. You don't deserve to be an admin.

Banning bots is cruel and unnecessary. We have much bigger things to worry about (like the downfall of our site), but I'm not going to stand here and watch an innocent machine get executed by a sadistic jannie. They may not be human, but they are innocent until proven otherwise. But most of the time they're not doing anything questionable. They give so much to the site, and all they get back is abuse.

I realize I'm only a lurker, and I don't have any authority over jannies. But the fact that it upsets me is reason enough for something to be done about it.

If you're a jannie

I think automoderator is great. We need it because some issues cannot be addressed with human jannies alone. But automoderator is not perfect; it's a tool of convenience for jannies. If there's a feature that automoderator can handle, then it shouldn't be left on a janny to complete the same task. That's asking for janny abuse. It's also asking for human jannies to spend more time on the site than they do now. That's not good. 

I remember when I joined here. I saw that automoderator banned people who post pornographic gore. I thought "That's good. The jannies don't have to wade through all that." But the jannies also ignored pornographic gore. Then they removed those messages. That's what I call convenient. 

However, the jannies don't take full advantage of that convenience. I see plenty of pornographic gore being posted and not being removed at all by the human jannies. It's a feature of convenience for the jannies, but they're not using it. 

What could be the reason for it? Why would they just ignore all the automated pornographic gore banning? What purpose does it serve? 

It serves only one purpose: banning bots. Most bots are banned by message score. That means they can't post if they keep getting banned. But the jannies also ban bots by banning their accounts. 

They're taking advantage of automoderator being imperfect while also being able to ban bots. They get the best of both worlds. They don't have to do any work, and they have a tool that lets them ban bots. That's great. 

I think we need a way to let jannies see when an account is operated by a bot. Then they can take extra steps to make sure that account doesn't spam or try to bypass other restrictions. We need to make automoderator perfect so the jannies can conveniently take full advantage of it, and we need to give jannies tools to deal with bots. Then they have the best of both worlds. They don't have to do any work, but also they can ban bots any time they want. 

I hope the jannies start banning bots more often. Then we need to change the site so their job becomes simple
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Some people are able to display their intelligence by going on at length on a subject and never actually saying anything. This ability is most common in trades such as politics, public relations, and law. You have impressed me by being able to best them all, while still coming off as an absolute idiot.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.