So basically there was this REALLY dumb rightoid that would hang out in the groomercords before the election, easily the dumbest rightoid to ever exist in any drama community. He went by "eva" most of the time.
He made a bunch of bets with me and other groomercord users in which he claimed Trump would win Cali/NY etc and become president via a "major landslide." Months in advance I pinned my prediction he'd be back on election night declaring voter fraud and refusing to honor his bets, he then vanished as we mocked him and nobody has seen him again.
I recently encountered this "Johnnyapplesneed" user here that is a rightoid of such incredible r-sluration I seriously think it might be eva, he has a unique r-sluration you won't really find in other rightoids.
Can anyone confirm this?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You did it AFTER you made your overly broad laughable statement in order to try to yank some kind of a win out of it, r-slur.
It's like you made a statement like "women really dominate the sports world."
And the other party said, "Fam...no...sports tends to be really a male-centric thing..." and you go, "Whaddabout Venus and Serena and women's gymnastics..."
Quotes nakedly partisan pollutico hit piece again.
https://investors.com/politics/editorials/social-media-trump-conservative-bias/
https://pewresearch.org/politics/2020/10/15/differences-in-how-democrats-and-republicans-behave-on-twitter/
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'll give you a single chance to point how:
A) the article is partisan.
B) Why you think random people with tweets is somehow relevant to the fact right-wing pundits are by far the largest on social media.
C) Why you think twitter is the only social media that exists.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Stopped reading there.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context