https://old.reddit.com/r/neoliberal/comments/1ebm22t/no_physical_commitment_to_the_future_of_this/
- 252
- 125
Top Poster of the Day:
J
Current Registered Users: 26,836
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
Live commit: 441c078
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Do you not know what "seizing the means of produktion" means,
Also fascist were also big on autarky lol, do you even know what the conversion was about?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Nazis were autarkic (?) out of necessity, Royal Navy guaranteed that. And before that Germany was already in massive foreign currency reserve crisis when they inherited the country, funneling all available imports to ones needed most by military. So they for example cracked down hard on steel industrialists when they were blocking development of local (shitty) iron ore mining (they wanted to keep importing quality
ore). This was all exasperated by their refusal to devaluate DM, out of political reasons avoiding the memory of inflation.
But they never separated their conquered countries from the economy of the Reich, especially since half of them they outright annexed anyway.
Meanwhile Stalin does annex eastern Poland, but after that makes Poland and Czechoslovakia and Romania and DDR each their own separate autarkik (?) economies, with very little trade in between.
don't know what you're talking about here
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Even before the war both Germany and Italy had attempted to implement autarkic economies as part of their corporatism. The entire reason for Japan's conquest was to secure resources and reduce reliance on western powers.
The fact that it seems like you didn't read any of the former replies in the thread? Also, you seem to think autarkic and seizure of assets are mutually exclusive
Anyway, I point it out because you seem to misunderstand why I said it.
Anime neighbor says atleast nazi had a functioning economy, coping commie says it heckin only worked because they kept fueling it with jew gold, I point out that the basis of Marxism by it's own definition is an economy built upon seizing the work of others, and then you come in rambling about something completely irrelevant.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context