Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

yes the united nations is an authority on human rights. The US is an authority on democracy freedom and equality, China is an authority on Common Prosperity and Socialism with Chinese Characteristics, Zulu is an authority on what precisely constitutes Zulu patrilineal indigenous shamanism, etc. maybe one or more of them are slightly inconsistent, but they are the ones who define and implement them.

Many of the basic ideas that animated the human rights movement developed in the aftermath of the Second World War and the events of the Holocaust,[6] culminating in the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in Paris by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948. Ancient peoples did not have the same modern-day conception of universal human rights.

The human rights enshrined in the UDHR, the Geneva Conventions and the various enforced treaties of the United Nations are enforceable in law. In practice, many rights are very difficult to legally enforce due to the absence of consensus on the application of certain rights, the lack of relevant national legislation or of bodies empowered to take legal action to enforce them.

The UN promulgated, defines, believes, and occasionally implements human rights laws.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh, I understand now. I thought you were just stupid but this comment is so far over the line that I now realized I've been getting baited.

Cheers. You got me.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

ur just rly dumb

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Bro, there's no need to be a peepee about it. Moral philosophy from a rights-based approach can logically appeal by authority to generally accepted notions of human rights. Do you really dispute that? Or are you saying that there's no such thing as human rights? What determines "human rights?"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Well, that just seems like a way of saying "might makes right". The concept of rights that we know of today came from the fact that the West dominated the world militarily, economically, politically and culturally for the past few hundred years. If the Middle East or East Asia or Africa had been the ones on top instead, who knows what the concept of "human rights" would look like today? :marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

might makes right".

Yeah, that's another way to view it.

the rest

Pretty similar, if they actually could dominate militarily, culturally, etc. People like Liberalism.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.