Unable to load image
Reported by:
  • 14881350 : YT hands typed this
  • FourthEggnog : Anyone seriousposting during weekends should unironically rope :marseyropeyourself:
  • EvilUbie : There's better ways to exercise than typing angrily all day. :marseyconcerned:

CONTINUED MEGASPERGING FROM NEW COMBATANTS IN PINNED COMMENT Resident Canadian rightoid can't comprehend total number vs percentages and believes the US electorate is getting smaller every 4 years and the media is covering it up.

https://rdrama.net/post/293093/magatard-has-a-meltdown-over-tv/6877978#context

Let this be an example of why I stopped trying to argue with rightoids. this person is so wildly r-slurred, so detached from reality he physically cannot comprehend how numbers work. When backed into a corner and proven wrong he falls back on the "the cabal is covering x thing I believe up, so I'm not actually wrong" gambit.

What is the cabal covering up today? the size of the US electorate, apparently - you see, the population doesn't have more voting age adults every 4 years.

88
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

illegal voting, mainly in city centers, mostly in blue states where it's harder to track but lets the party save face.

Based on literally what, other than wishful thinking lmao?

obviously the risk and reward comes from doing it in swing states, which they were able to pull off in 2020 by abusing mail-in voting due to COVID via their agent Dr. Fauci, who Trump did not realize turned swamp creature and trusted until it was too late.

Eva you are literally an r-slur if you think the 2020 election had widespread fraud. Only by being an r-slured canadian with no idea how US elections work can you think that.

I knew the election was over at 11 pm on election night because Trump wildly under-performed the in person vote. It was the most obvious loss ever, all of the data said he was losing for months, he was historically unpopular.

"president with 30% approval rating down 6 points loses election, news at 11."

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>appeal to mail-in vote legitimacy, while still implying it was necessary to biden's win

>appeal to "polling"

lol

lmao

why are we going in circles you know I think both those things are fake lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

we have 50+ years of data showing how relevant polling is, you absolute r-slur.

how are they fake? Based on what?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>we have 50+ years of data showing how relevant polling is, you absolute r-slur

wrong. you HAD it, until 2016 when someone changed politics and coverage/analysis of it in the USA forever

>how are they fake? Based on what?

based on Trump Derangement Syndrome

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

wrong. you HAD it, until 2016 when someone changed politics and coverage/analysis of it in the USA forever

What lol? The polling was literally within margin of error in 2016, as in the average polling error is like 2%, which is about what it was in 2016.

based on Trump Derangement Syndrome

buddy you think a 2 point polling error (the historical norm) in 2016 somehow means polling is fake lmao.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>revisionist history nonsense

:#marseysleep:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.