The BBC invites this doctor on to talk about prostate-cancer screening. When pressed in the replies he is simply unwilling to say which type of human needs such screening. 'People with prostates,' he says, circularly. This is the end-point of reality denialism https://t.co/KO96MGsnNo
— Helen Joyce (@HJoyceGender) January 13, 2022
(Pro)statists mad
https://twitter.com/HJoyceGender/status/1481656625119121414
- 36
- 60
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
People with prostates is accurate and descriptive.
If someone had to get their prostate removed for medical reasons, then they don’t need to worry about prostate cancer
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, it’s a non answer to the question of “who needs to get their prostate checked”. Of course it’s “people with prostates” but it doesn’t tell you who is likely to have a prostate. It’s not a helpful answer at all.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Right, it's a circular definition and completely useless.
Good morning, I hate wokies.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
If you want a question like “who is likely to have prostates” answered, maybe you should ask it.
The great game. Play it well, or die.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context