P-do-Commie asked to define a "Woman"

https://youtube.com/watch?v=y4t7tE_rtLE&t=2026s

Guys, it's really simple, let's update the dictionary:

Woman

noun, plural womΒ·en [wim-in].

1 an adult female person. Uhm, I would say that a woman is sort of a social archetype that people choose to adopt, uhm, like a, kind of like an identifier that they want to be known by. Obviously, you know, there is a lot of conflation here 'cause people get 'assigned' this that or the other which means that you sort of grow up with a set of roles and definitions before you're even old enough to have any opinion on the subject really. Uhm, but at least when we're talking about, you know, gender as an identity, you know, what people care about when you're older, that's what I think of, you know, like being a woman, what does it mean to be a woman, uhm, it's it's it's how you think of yourself and how you want the world to think of you it's a sandwich board slung around your neck, uh with a set of identifiers you want to be considered by. Compare man (def. 1), girl (def. 1).

2 a female employee or representative:

A woman from the real estate agency called.


You are all valid.

13
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Trans lives matter

![](/images/16507754147001376.webp)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How do people watch more than 2 minutes of this nonsense and not get bored?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He pulled it out of his bussy, Snappy

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How tf are they having so much trouble with this

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.