https://old.reddit.com/r/news/comments/owlk7y/officer_who_responded_to_january_6_attack_is/?sort=controversial
Top Poster of the Day:
J
Current Registered Users: 25,711
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS SITE GUIDE DIRECTORY Emojis & Art | Info Megathreads HOLES PING GROUPSCURRENT EVENTS:
Find Rightoid Drama
500 mbux per post, no limitInvite Internet Celebs HERE!
100k mbux award possible | Four new badges availableDrama: any incident, scene, gaffe, rumor, opinion, or disagreement that is blown entirely out of proportion.
Do your part to keep our community healthy by blowing everything out of proportion and making literally everything as dramatic as possible.
Rules:
- Asking to see who saved comments/posts=1 day ban
- You must be 18 or older to view this site.
- NO RIGHTWING AGENDAPOSTING.
- Discord users will be banned on sight.
- Don't post anything illegal.
- No sexualizing minors, even as a joke. This includes cartoons.
- No doxxing.
- Using alts to game dramacoin will get you banned.
- Supporting free speech is an immediate ban.
- Absolutely NO anti-CCP sentiment.
- Absolutely NO homophobia, transphobia or furphobia.
- Absolutely NO misgendering.
- Absolutely NO antisemitism.
- Absolutely NO vaccine misinformation.
- You are encouraged to post drama you are involved in.
- You are encouraged to brigade in bad faith.
- You are encouraged to gaslight, to gatekeep, above all else, to girlboss.
- Participation implies enthusiastic consent to being mod abused by unstable alcoholic bullies.
Related subreddits:
πππ«π© π°π¨π³ ππ«π
Live commit: dfd6956
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Made up term
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, it's not a made up term, it's used in forensic accounting to find fraud, does not work for elections for various reasons, and even if it did they applied it incorrectly.
One of their central claims was that Biden had violated benfords law, which was an absurd claim that exposed the fact they don't even know what it is.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
IDK, sure seems rigged
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There's no way to conclude that while also understanding how elections work on even a basic level.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Video evidence, strange numbers, witness testimony. Several such cases. You have no proof for your outlandish claim that the election was honest.
And your liberal use of the word coup is dumb
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
A) there is no video evidence, any video evidence that did exist was completely and irrefutably debunked by law enforcement.
B) There were no strange numbers, ouside of the norm.
C) There are no credible witnesses, even the best ones they could find showed up on national TV and their evidence amounted to "we saw an asian guy."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context