!chuds which one of you made this film

Reddit soys are already out with their predictable film-pseud defence "Duuude, this is going to be spectacularly terrible, I'll love it ".

These are the top comments.

Sounds like it has all the ingredients of a cult film, but not a financially successful one

--

Darn these Reviews are all over the place, people who like it are praising it highly, and people who don't are thrashing it.

Sounds like it's gonna be fun love polarizing films

So basically Coppola lost his sanity and made an unmarketable 120 million dollar epic. I'm so hyped!

120 million dollars to create something you truly love that others absolutely hate… That's the dream baby ! Cinema is back !

__

Can't wait. It's either going to be beautiful, or a beautiful disaster. Either way, it sounds worth watching.

__

The reality is even the positive reviews are handling this film with kids gloves. They struggle to articulate what's good about it and are basically going "uhh...this film is ambitious and Coppola(an industry legend) took a lot of risks and we must respect it for that"

Yeah sure

!kino !fellas !anime

A scene so awkward and stupidly written that it created an entire ecosystem of memes. https://t.co/J40TDwdFzw

— Leman Walters (@LemanWalters) May 13, 2024

!kino

https://twitter.com/britpopforali/status/1790007485337604480

https://twitter.com/SquishyMrMallow/status/1790010049328185849

https://twitter.com/InnerDelicious/status/1790023688093352279

https://twitter.com/rannyg/status/1790012305381487066

https://twitter.com/BrianEpshteyn/status/1790002796927861215

https://twitter.com/AxelAswell/status/1790009431876423740

https://twitter.com/munzacore90/status/1790022854647468210

https://twitter.com/MKQUANFUSION/status/1790010888503575012

https://twitter.com/C2410897952998/status/1790009270794162354

https://twitter.com/randomname2617/status/1790002586306654366

https://twitter.com/Sneed3Sneed/status/1790000439330480428

https://twitter.com/MJ_Peterson_69/status/1790007861751242984

https://twitter.com/MantisRe1igiosa/status/1790006808494383291

https://twitter.com/__Rolfy/status/1790024649096483312

Even Marvelcels are like "that's still too much lol".

https://old.reddit.com/r/entertainment/comments/1cmbo49/marvel_will_release_no_more_than_three_movies_and/?sort=controversial

https://old.reddit.com/r/Marvel/comments/1cmfb1a/marvel_will_release_no_more_than_three_movies_and/?sort=controversial

https://old.reddit.com/r/Fauxmoi/comments/1cmbx6i/marvel_will_release_no_more_than_three_movies_and/?sort=controversial

Marvel Will Release No More Than Three Movies and Two Shows Per Year, Bob Iger Says

Disney CEO Bob Iger says the company is shrinking the MCU with a new mission to drop the number of Marvel TV series to two a year and the film output to no more than three movies per year.

Iger said this is part of Disney's overall strategy to reduce output and focus on quality, a strategy “that's particularly true with Marvel.”

“We're slowly going to decrease volume and go to probably about two TV series a year instead of what had become four and reduce our film output from maybe four a year to two, or a maximum of three,” the Disney CEO said during the company's quarterly earnings call Tuesday. “And we're working hard on what that path is.”

Iger says Marvel has “a couple of good films in '25 and then we're heading to more ‘Avengers,' which we're extremely excited about,” adding: “Overall, I feel great about the slate. It's something that I've committed to spending more and more time on. The team is one that I have tremendous confidence in and the IP that we're mining, including all the sequels that we're doing, is second to none.”

The announcement is at odds with the most recent release calendar distributed by Disney, which has four films from Marvel Studios slated for 2025 — “Captain America: Brave New World,” “Thunderbolts,” “The Fantastic Four,” and “Blade” — and four more Marvel movies slated for 2026, including the fifth “Avengers” movie. Marvel is releasing a single film in 2024, “Deadpool & Wolverine.” (Historically, the only time Marvel has released more than three movies in a year was in 2021, after the studio sat out 2020 due to the pandemic: “Black Widow,” “Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings,” “Eternals” and “Spider-Man: No Way Home” — the latter of which was a co-production with Sony Pictures.)

On the TV side, Iger says that a portion of the upcoming series, a slate that includes the Kathryn Hahn-led “WandaVision” spinoff “Agatha,” set for release are “a vestige of basically a desire in the past to increase volume.”

While Iger has previously stated plans to reduce Marvel franchise output, he's not previously been this direct in terms of exactly how many titles Disney plans to release for both TV and film each year.

Later in the call, Iger fielded a question about Disney's focus on sequels and originals, noting that the focus is currently more on franchise films: “We're gonna balance sequels with originals. Specifically in animation, we had gone through a period where our original films and animation, both Disney and Pixar, were dominating. We're now swinging back a bit to lean on sequels.”

Iger cited Disney's plans for the next “Toy Story” movie and this summer's release of “Inside Out 2” and said these films have an increased value because known IP costs less to market.

For Marvel, Iger pointed to new movie “Thunderbolts” coming in 2025 alongside sequels “Deadpool & Wolverine” this summer and “Captain America: Brave New World” next year. “It'll just be a balance, which we think is is right,” Iger said.

Seems like @KinoBushido has died and we haven't had one of these in a while

As always NO ANIME

I don't have anything to talk about other than finishing Masters of the Air. Was pretty kino.

https://www.primevideo.com/detail/Fallout/0HAQAA7JM43QWX0H6GUD3IOF70

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/fallout/s01 93% on RT

https://www.metacritic.com/tv/fallout/ 72/100 Metascore

!g*mers !kino

New clip from ‘X-MEN 97’

Premieres tomorrow on Disney+ pic.twitter.com/Wv5c3BAexx

— DiscussingFilm (@DiscussingFilm) March 19, 2024

The new trailer for ‘FURIOSA’ has been released.

In theaters on May 24. pic.twitter.com/mUIVrOq8Ct

— DiscussingFilm (@DiscussingFilm) March 19, 2024

Just realized this is the 2nd trailer.

Around 2003 in Chile, when the original trilogy of Star Wars began airing on television there, they did this funny thing to avoid cutting to commercial breaks. They stitched the commercials into the films themselves. Here is one of them, with the English dub added in. pic.twitter.com/wC7N2vPNvv

— Windy 🛸 (@heyitswindy) March 2, 2024

!boozers !kino

Give the Chileans the next trilogy

This made me feel more emotion than anything by Disney in a decade. so sweet

I've been following this guy's work for the last year and it turned out so good.

Everything Eastwood has directed post that movie where he yells at Filipino kids has been treated with kid gloves, because he's been 100 years old for ages and every expects all his releases to be his last. So when he releases an absolute stinker critics will sort of acknowledge that the movie is poorly directed but still give it a charity thumbs up.

But he's never been a good director, even when he was a spry 60 year old back in the 80s. He's gotten worse, for sure, and he basically stopped 'directing' actively now that's he old enough to get a letter from the Queen (he apparently has a bunch of assistants that do everything for him on set, it's not clear what his input is aside from choosing a script) but he's ALWAYS been incredibly lazy. Every movie he's made that has been passable has been so on the basis of a strong script and performances (Million Dollar Baby, some of his westerns) from actors that don't need direction. But when he's put out to sea without either of those things you can see that his 'directorial style' amounts to pointing the camera at whichever actor is moving the most and making the most noise, giving them one take and if they don't get it right frick it, cut and print. Lighting or sound fricked up? Who cares, no one pays attention to that.

it's sad because he's always been kind of based, and it's funny that he keeps casting relatively young women to frick him for the movies in which he acts. nothing funnier than a full-blown decrepit 90 year old being blown by a Hollywood-faced 45 year old woman pretending she's a similar age as him

like every year some retatd studio executive has 20 million to burn and decides to give it to clint eastwood to barely direct some movie about a horse rider who gets sad about mexico or sum shit

Now, don't get me wrong. It's a tiresome topic like "Is Die Hard a Christmas movie?" Or "Tropic Thunder couldn't be made today" but we all know these twats are malding because this statement critiques woke culture . God knows /r/movies isn't exactly a place for having a healthy discussion outside of the same dozen circlejerk topics .

!kino