None

I do!

None

When?

None

hurr durr

None
1
So lond as wpd exist, I know carp and aevann are losers

"marseysigh"

None
3
Read and weep, plebs

inferior

None

You know who are and how pathetic you really are.

None
2
Mental health and terminally online

google scholar or pubmed

plactics in the water supply

and too much internet access

None
1
Hippies win again!

Oct 2 (Reuters) - Birkenstock, the German premium footwear brand backed by private-equity firm L Catterton, said on Monday it is seeking a valuation of up to $9.2 billion in its highly anticipated U.S. initial public offering (IPO).

The company and its stockholders are expecting to sell at least 32 million shares, likely to be priced between $44 and $49 apiece, and potentially raise about $1.58 billion at the top-end of the range, according to a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

The IPO market is seeing a slow revival in activity after being on ice for a couple of years, but the post-debut performances of companies that have listed so far this year including Instacart (CART.O) and Arm have been mixed.

The market is also expected to see more action in the coming days as the U.S. securities regulator is well-staffed now that a government shutdown has been averted, allowing it to review more IPO filings.

"Investor sentiment is still highly sensitive, particularly given the realisation that high interest rates are set to linger. So, despite the heady ambitions, Birkenstock may still end up listing at a mid or lower price in the range, regardless of all the publicity," said Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets, Hargreaves Lansdown.

Birkenstock has decided to list its shares on the New York Stock Exchange, under the ticker symbol 'BIRK'.

Financière Agache, controlled by Europe's Arnault family that owns LVMH (LVMH.PA), has indicated an interest in buying $325 million of ordinary shares in the offering, Birkenstock said.

One or more funds managed by Durable Capital Partners LP and Norges Bank Investment Management have separately indicated an interest in buying shares together worth $300 million.

Birkenstock's trademark typically has been comfort rather than fashion. But it has also found favor among fashion aficionados, reportedly more so in recent weeks after one of its brands was featured in "Barbie" blockbuster where the movie's lead actress Margot Robbie was seen donning a pair of pink Birkenstock.

The company, which traces its roots back to 1774, is a sixth-generation family-owned business.

Last month, the company said its revenue jumped 21% in the nine-month period ended June 30, showing strength against a difficult demand environment for luxury goods as inflation-weary consumers temper their spending.

Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan and Morgan Stanley are among the underwriters for the IPO.

Reporting by Niket Nishant and Manya Saini in Bengaluru; Editing by Anil D'Silva and Sherry Jacob-Phillips

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Manya Saini

Thomson Reuters

Manya Saini reports on prominent publicly listed U.S. financial firms including Wall Street's biggest banks, card companies, asset managers and fintechs. Also covers late-stage venture capital funding, initial public offerings on U.S. exchanges alongside news and regulatory developments in the cryptocurrency industry. Her work usually appears in the finance, markets, business and future of money sections of the website. Contact: 9958867986

Read Next

Dealscategory

UK's Pendragon agrees to sweetened buyout of UK motor, leasing businesses

British auto dealer Pendragon said on Monday it had agreed to sell its UK motor and leasing businesses to Lithia Motors for a sweetened offer of 397 million pounds ($482.00 million).

Dealscategory

Shipper MSC to buy 50% stake in Italian passenger rail group Italo

Shipping group MSC has entered into a binding agreement to acquire a 50% stake in Italian passenger rail operator Italo, owned by U.S.-based Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP), it said on Monday.

Dealscategory

Digital World, Trump's media firm add new termination clause to merger deal

Digital World Acquisition and former U.S. President Donald Trump's media company have added an option that allows them to terminate their merger deal between Oct. 31 and Nov. 21, a regulatory filing showed on Monday.

Dealscategory

Russian tech firm Astra plans October IPO on Moscow Exchange

Russian technology company Astra on Monday said it was planning to list its shares on Moscow Exchange this month in an initial public offering (IPO), potentially breathing some life into Russia's moribund equity capital markets.

Dealscategory

China's Hollysys to consider $1.55 bln takeover bid, seek other offers

China's Hollysys Automation Technologies , which makes automation and control systems, said on Monday it had set up a committee to consider a $1.55 billion takeover offer from a consortium led by Recco Control Technology and Dazheng Group Investment Holdings and look at other offers.

Newsletter|Every other week.

Reuters On the Money

Sign up for the Reuters On the Money newsletter to get U.S. finance tips and insights.

Birk is actually garbage. The cork footbed is weak and doens't hold up to the soft rubber outsole compound. I"ve wore out more pairs than ever got work in

None
None
1
I've told you over and over. In many ways.

dumbasses dom't listen

None
1
When is frozen going to tell the truth about mellokind?

?

None
1
Book reading. :marseyreading: Wheel of time as read by Rosamind Pike.

Carp can't keep up with a an intelligent discussion about the in and outs of the tv series vs the books because it's forgotten too much.

Pick up the books and read and listen to the new releases of the readings

Kitty

None
7
creation

Okay, You've lost me. Let's go back to this school bit. I've heard teacher after teacher tell us that life is a school. I'm frankly shocked to hear You deny that.

School is a place you go if there is something you do not know that you want to know. It is not a place you go if you already know a thing and simply want to experience your knowingness.

Life (as you call it) is an opportunity for you to know experientially what you already know conceptually. You need learn nothing to do this. You need merely remember what you already know, and act on it.

I'm not sure I understand.

Let's start here. The soul—your soul—knows all there is to know all the time. There's nothing hidden to it, nothing unknown. Yet knowing is not enough. The soul seeks to experience.

You can know yourself to be generous, but unless you do something which displays generosity, you have nothing but a concept. You can know yourself to be kind, but unless you do someone a kindness, you have nothing but an idea about yourself.

It is your soul's only desire to turn its grandest concept about itself into its greatest experience. Until concept becomes experience, all there is is speculation. I have been speculating about Myself for a long time. Longer than you and I could collectively remember. Longer than the age of this universe times the age of the universe. You see, then, how young is—how new is—My experience of Myself!

You've lost me again. Your experience of Yourself?

Yes. Let me explain it to you this way:

In the beginning, that which Is is all there was, and there was nothing else. Yet All That Is could not know itself—because All That Is is all there was, and there was nothing else. And so, All That Is… was not. For in the absence of something else, All That Is, is not.

This is the great Is/Not Is to which mystics have referred from the beginning of time.

Now All That Is knew it was all there was—but this was not enough, for it could only know its utter magnificence conceptually, not experientially. Yet the experience of itself is that for which it longed, for it wanted to know what it felt like to be so magnificent. Still, this was impossible, because the very term “magnificent” is a relative term. All That Is could not know what it felt like to be magnificent unless that which is not showed up. In the absence of that which is not, that which IS, is not.

Do you understand this?

I think so. Keep going.

Alright The one thing that All That Is knew is that there was nothing else. And so It could, and would, never know Itself from a reference point outside of Itself. Such a point did not exist. Only one reference point existed, and that was the single place within. The “Is-Not Is.” The Am-Not Am.

Still, the All of Everything chose to know Itself experientially.

This energy—this pure, unseen, unheard, unobserved, and therefore unknown-by-anyone-else energy—chose to experience Itself as the utter magnificence It was. In order to do this, It realized It would have to use a reference point within.

It reasoned, quite correctly, that any portion of Itself would necessarily have to be less than the whole, and that if It thus simply divided Itself into portions, each portion, being less than the whole, could look back on the rest of Itself and see magnificence.

And so All That Is divided Itself—becoming, in one glorious moment, that which is this, and that which is that. For the first time, this and that existed, quite apart from each other. And still, both existed simultaneously. As did all that was neither.

Thus, three elements suddenly existed: that which is here. That which is there. And that which is neither here nor there—but which must exist for here and there to exist.

It is the nothing which holds the everything. It is the non-space which holds the space. It is the all which holds the parts.

Can you understand this?

Are you following this?

I think I am, actually. Believe it or not, you have used such a clear illustration that I think I'm actually understanding this.

I'm going to go further. Now this nothing which holds the everything is what some people call God. Yet that is not accurate, either, for it suggests that there is something God is not—namely, everything that is not “nothing.” But I am All Things—seen and unseen—so this description of Me as the Great Unseen—the No-Thing, or the Space Between, an essentially Eastern mystical definition of God, is no more accurate than the essentially Western practical description of God as all that is seen. Those who believe that God is All That Is and All That Is Not, are those whose understanding is correct.

Now in creating that which is “here” and that which is “there,” God made it possible for God to know Itself. In the moment of this great explosion from within, God created relativity—the greatest gift God ever gave to Itself. Thus, relationship is the greatest gift God ever gave to you, a point to be discussed in detail later.

From the No-Thing thus sprang the Everything—a spiritual event entirely consistent, incidentally, with what your scientists call The Big Bang theory. As the elements of all raced forth, time was created, for a thing was first here, then it was there—and the period it took to get from here to there was measurable.

Just as the parts of Itself which are seen began to define themselves, “relative” to each other, so, too, did the parts which are unseen. God knew that for love to exist—and to know itself as pure love—its exact opposite had to exist as well. So God voluntarily created the great polarity—the absolute opposite of love—everything that love is not—what is now called fear. In the moment fear existed, love could exist as a thing that could be experienced.

It is this creation of duality between love and its opposite which humans refer to in their various mythologies as the birth of evil, the fall of Adam, the rebellion of Satan, and so forth.

Just as you have chosen to personify pure love as the character you call God, so have you chosen to personify abject fear as the character you call the devil.

Some on Earth have established rather elaborate mythologies around this event, complete with scenarios of battles and war, angelic soldiers and devilish warriors, the forces of good and evil, of light and dark.

This mythology has been mankind's early attempt to understand, and tell others in a way they could understand, a cosmic occurrence of which the human soul is deeply aware, but of which the mind can barely conceive.

In rendering the universe as a divided version of Itself, God produced, from pure energy, all that now exists—both seen and unseen. In other words, not only was the physical universe thus created, but the metaphysical universe as well. The part of God which forms the second half of the Am/Not Am equation also exploded into an infinite number of units smaller than the whole. These energy units you would call spirits. In some of your religious mythologies it is stated that “God the Father” had many spirit children. This parallel to the human experiences of life multiplying Itself seems to be the only way the masses could be made to hold in reality the idea of the sudden appearance—the sudden existence—of countless spirits in the “Kingdom of Heaven.”

In this instance, your mythical tales and stories are not so far from ultimate reality—for the endless spirits comprising the totality of Me are, in a cosmic sense, My offspring.

My divine purpose in dividing Me was to create sufficient parts of Me so that I could know Myself experientially. There is only one way for the Creator to know Itself experientially as the Creator, and that is to create. And so I gave to each of the countless parts of Me (to all of My spirit children) the same power to create which I have as the whole.

This is what your religions mean when they say that you were created in the “image and likeness of God.” This doesn't mean, as some have suggested, that our physical bodies look alike (although God can adopt whatever physical form God chooses for a particular purpose). It does mean that our essence is the same. We are composed of the same stuff. We ARE the “same stuff”! With all the same properties and abilities—including the ability to create physical reality out of thin air.

None

I recognized that a long time ago

None
3
@A @xy get rid of wpd

it a good time

None
1
read this

“A true Master is not the one with the most students, but one who creates the most Masters. A true leader is not the one with the most followers, but one who creates the most leaders. A true king is not the one with the most subjects, but one who leads the most to royalty. A true teacher is not the one with the most knowledge, but one who causes the most others to have knowledge. And a true God is not One with the most servants, but One who serves the most, thereby making Gods of all others. For this is both the goal and the glory of God: that His subjects shall be no more, and that all shall know God not as the unattainable, but as the unavoidable.”

None
None
1
I'd like to answer the "trans question:.

ama

None

Can you imagine people pretending to be like other people?

None
Reported by:
1
Jack

Jack was really a jester

Who held his one good eye on the queen

And there sat the king beside her

He's pointing his sword up and down with every scene

And the wizard's in the corner

Catching peanuts between his teeth

And the dogs lying in the shadow in the archway

There's one good dog sleeping filled with good ol' dog dreams

He slipped next to the wizard

Whispered something deep, to the bottom of his ear

A little joke, the one about the farmer's daughter

How she was stomping on grapes, coming up with blue feet and beer

And he slipped behind the queen

Where the fools go the rich don't mind

Lately the king's (k)nights have turned a little rusty

And his halo - I mean his crown - has gone and slipped down around his eyes

The wizard's in the corner

Pulling lizards between his knees

And the dog he been long gone

Gone to pitch for the winning team

Fifty-two, I mean fifty-four bicycles on the wall

Ready to ride, ready to ride until the last of them falls

Jack's been cooking in the kitchen

Whompin' up some biscuits for us all

For us all, For us all

Ready to ride, ready to ride, ride

Source: LyricFind

Songwriters: D. Schools / J. Bell / J. Hermann / M. Houser / S. Ortiz / T. Nance

Jack lyrics © BMG Rights Management

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.