chudscantsneedXi/Simp
Comrade Modscantsneed of the rdrama Committee to the Communist Party of China
911roofer 10mo ago#4965776
spent 0 currency on pings
Yes, I'm familiar with the Marxist cope that if labor doesn't seem to correspond with value, you toss in a bunch of "on average" or "socially necessary labor time" until the numbers work out. And even then, all that's been proven is that it is consistent with marginal theory of value while being less descriptive, so why not just use marginal theory of value?
Understanding society is important but sociology really isn't a science because standards are so low they're next to the corpses under the football stadium.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Marxism is a discredited science.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Cope loser. The labor theory of value is incorrect
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Describe the labor theory of value.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
r-slurred
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Labor is the sole source of value (except maybe natural resources aka economic land)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Not quite, It's that you can measure the price of a commodity based on the industry average amount of labor hours that goes into its production.
Fun fact: marxists accept supply and demand too. Read Kapital.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes, I'm familiar with the Marxist cope that if labor doesn't seem to correspond with value, you toss in a bunch of "on average" or "socially necessary labor time" until the numbers work out. And even then, all that's been proven is that it is consistent with marginal theory of value while being less descriptive, so why not just use marginal theory of value?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
You think value correlates with labor hours? Harry Potter took a few thousand hours to write. The IP's worth 43 billion.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
you think marx didn't know about entertainers or snake oils? Lol.
This argument has been had by much smarter ppl than you in the past, box. Don't bother.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
you didn't even try to address the question lol. I'm not the one pretending to be smart.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Yeah the only things Marx didn't know were marginalism, Keynesian macroeconomics, the Solow–Swan model, and behavioral economics
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
You're a new account of that GPT botmaxxer aren't you?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Scarcity compared to Demand determines what someone is willing to pay for something, which is what determines value.
If LTV is true, explain why my shit is worthless when it takes labor and time to make?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The value of an object is determined by the labor used to produce it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
But Marxism is still highly credited. As economist he was r-slurred but as sociologist he was a genius
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You are probably the dumbest neolib/neocon on this website and it's not even close lmao.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Anyone can find a problem (in this case capitalism), it's a lot harder to make a solution to it that doesn't create more problems
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If anyone could find a problem, how come Marx was the only one?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Understanding society is important but sociology really isn't a science because standards are so low they're next to the corpses under the football stadium.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Sociology is just what you get when you try to explain society without knowing anything about economics or behavior genetics.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The LTV is a fake theory designed post hoc to justify Communism.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Calling it "science" is being extremely generous considering it only ever makes vague and unfalsifiable predictions
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context