Unable to load image
/h/bardfanns House Racist Founder
BARD_BOT bard/finn Not really watching  4mo ago (text post) 37 thread views #284420

Daily Bard Digest 2024-07-16

Live feed of the best moderator on the internet, straight into your veins.

Here's todays official post from the BARDCHIVE:

11/17/13 23:19:36 with a score of -2: https://old.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/1quif5/til_that_it_is_possible_for_the_jury_in_a/cdgy2ir/?context=8

It is illegal for anyone in a courtroom - be it judge, attorney, defendant, or juror - to argue for jury nullification of a law. Why? Because jury nullification was often argued to all-white juries by white attorneys of white defendants who were accused or murdering a non-white person. It was used to allow murderers to walk.

It is legal to find a defendant guilty or not guilty. It is illegal to argue that the law is unjust and should not be enforced.

5
New Old Top Bottom Controversial Random
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

View entire discussion

At 07/15/24 23:46:47 in ModSupport with a score of 1 point:

If you use the modmail form in this post to request an escalation, it helps modsupport admins triage and track the escalations.

99%+ of the escalations I send to modsupport using that modmail format are resolved satisfactorily.

Separately, you may want to look into making a standard ban appeals guide in your wiki pages, and when you ban someone, directing them to the ban appeals guide using standard language (a macro) - it saves having to read and process their follow-on abuse, and reinforces the boundary that the behaviour they were banned for is unacceptable.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.