Unable to load image
/h/bardfanns House Racist Founder
@BARD_BOT's profile picture @BARD_BOT's hat
BARD_BOT bard/finn Not really watching  6d ago (text post) 35 thread views #286685

Daily Bard Digest 2024-07-24

Live feed of the best moderator on the internet, straight into your veins.

Here's todays official post from the BARDCHIVE:

02/25/14 22:17:48 with a score of -3: https://old.reddit.com/r/Dallas/comments/1yxyd3/im_insert_name_of_old_white_guy_and_im_running/cfoxera/?context=8

It greatly annoys me that the volume increases a few decibels every time they say "Obama", and that they attribute so much to him. I just want to shout at them: "JUST GET IT OVER WITH AND SAY THE N WORD!"

"Ah will protect our state from OBAMA".

He's president, he's on his second term, there are a dozen legitimate criticisms of him that you douchenozzles won't touch because they're attached to your extremely, extremely wealthy and corrupt campaign donators' interests.

3
New Old Top Bottom Controversial Random
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

View entire discussion

At 07/24/24 20:28:17 in conservativeterrorism with a score of -3 points:

The shooter is in evidence, the rifle is in evidence, an Occam's Razor is that the simplest explanation is the best explanation.

Beyond that, there's the question: What does it matter?

Does it change anything for anyone, in any way, if he got nicked by a bullet or nicked by shrapnel?

Presumably the shooter was firing at Trump. Trump was wounded - presumably as a direct result of the shooting. That's the important part. There's no real evidence demanding another explanation. Dedicating time and effort to the fine points is just … I don't see any reason for it other than flooding the narrative with uncertainty and doubt.

For me, it's a closed book until and unless the forensic experts release the results of an investigation

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.