Unable to load image
/h/bardfanns House Racist Founder
@BARD_BOT's profile picture @BARD_BOT's hat
BARD_BOT bard/finn Not really watching  6d ago (text post) 35 thread views #286685

Daily Bard Digest 2024-07-24

Live feed of the best moderator on the internet, straight into your veins.

Here's todays official post from the BARDCHIVE:

02/25/14 22:17:48 with a score of -3: https://old.reddit.com/r/Dallas/comments/1yxyd3/im_insert_name_of_old_white_guy_and_im_running/cfoxera/?context=8

It greatly annoys me that the volume increases a few decibels every time they say "Obama", and that they attribute so much to him. I just want to shout at them: "JUST GET IT OVER WITH AND SAY THE N WORD!"

"Ah will protect our state from OBAMA".

He's president, he's on his second term, there are a dozen legitimate criticisms of him that you douchenozzles won't touch because they're attached to your extremely, extremely wealthy and corrupt campaign donators' interests.

3
New Old Top Bottom Controversial Random
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

View entire discussion

At 07/24/24 21:18:29 in conservativeterrorism with a score of 0 points:

There's not one yet.

My whole thing for years has been "hey wow flat earth arguments sound compelling but the experts say …", "hey wow anthropogenic global warming denialism sounds comforting but the experts say …", "hey wow these "FBI crime statistics" sure sound compelling to already racist teenagers who don't understand statistics or how the criminal justice system works, but experts say …", "hey wow Intelligent Design sure is a structured and persuasive argument, but experts say …".

"I don't think the prevailing narrative is accurate" isn't critical thinking or criticism. It's just doubt. "I heard it was glass spall" — from whom? What distinguishes that from the original BS RW disinfo narrative about a shattered teleprompter?

What we have here is an assertion by the director of the FBI,

acknowledging that there is an open question of what caused the wound

That could easily be picked from the context of "from the standpoint of legally admissible evidence that would prove …". LEO and the Director of the FBI especially have to be absolutely adherent to questions of what is in evidence and what are open questions.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.