Here we spot wild Bardfinn Bluesky activities.
Be valid and ping ! bardfinn for something worthwhile or create a new thread.
Here we spot wild Bardfinn Bluesky activities.
Be valid and ping ! bardfinn for something worthwhile or create a new thread.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
rahaeli (@rahaeli.bsky.social):
I've had this run by me for vetting, and with the caveat that I don't know many specifics about Twitter's internal tooling, this doesn't even pass the basic sniff test to me for multiple reasons: there's no certificate for the sub-subdomain and never has been, the exceptions lists are WAY too short,
rahaeli (@rahaeli.bsky.social):
there's no internal accounts, test accounts, accounts of other prominent users outside a very narrow bubble, etc; some of the accounts are misspelled; the wordlist is missing a TON of slurs that any list should have and does have a bunch of words that are not in common use among that crowd --
adrian (@aaaaaadrian.com):
Does the fact that the account was almost immediately suspended after posting it bear any weight? Obviously there can be a million things we can't see that the account was doing, but the timing is what surprised me.
Ms. Penny Oaken (@skywitches.net):
With the way XChan is run, no. Nothing can be readily inferred from it other than "someone felt this was a threat to X's stability"
adrian (@aaaaaadrian.com):
XChan π β very good point.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context