Here we spot wild Bardfinn Bluesky activities.
Be valid and ping ! bardfinn for something worthwhile or create a new thread.
Bard spotting on Bluesky 30 August 2024 
- 18
- 3
Top Poster of the Day:
peepeehands
Current Registered Users: 28,697
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
/h/bardfanns SETTINGS /h/bardfanns LOG /h/bardfanns MODS /h/bardfanns EXILEES /h/bardfanns FOLLOWERS /h/bardfanns BLOCKERS
Current software version: ad94dbd
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Mike Masnick (@mmasnick.bsky.social):
Hey @davidkaye.bsky.social, help me out. Is this (auto translated) bit of Brazil's order saying (1) that Google & Apple need to block VPNs or (2) that VPNs need to block X?
And if it's that they need to block VPNs, does that seem as bad to you as it does to me?
Jer (@jerandom.bsky.social):
They take attempts to overthrow the government very seriously in other countries that aren't the US
Mike Masnick (@mmasnick.bsky.social):
Banning VPNs is not taking the matter seriously. It's fricking crazy.
Jer (@jerandom.bsky.social):
Look at it without the American perspective. A group of revolutionaries attempted to overthrow the democratically elected government and did their organization online. The American billionaire who owns the online platform refuses to cooperate in the investigation and continues to encourage 1/
Jer (@jerandom.bsky.social):
the very same people to do the same thing. This is a national security issue for them, and the tech we have gives very few options for cutting off access to the organizing platform used by these traitors. Is it a bad option? Yes. But they don't have many others 2/
Mike Masnick (@mmasnick.bsky.social):
Why does everyone insist that my views are based on "looking at it as an American"? It's pretty insulting. I've been covering global internet regulations for years and bad laws and bad application of laws is not a moral relevancy issue. What's bad is bad.
Jer (@jerandom.bsky.social):
Read the rest if what I wrote. What do you suggest they do about this?
Ms. Penny Oaken (@skywitches.net):
Given the language that is in the preamble of the decision — which goes on at length about defeating censorship and freedom of expression — The court should not be outlawing VPNs, which are used for far more than merely accessing Twitter.
Ms. Penny Oaken (@skywitches.net):
They should be consistent in criminalising the act of providing access to Twitter in a "subterfuge" manner, but VPNs themselves are a general use technology, built in to / inseparable from iOS & android.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, don't reply like this, please do another wall of unhinged rant please.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context