Unable to load image
/h/bardfanns
BardWatch She/Her Anti-Hate-Brigade  2mo ago (text post) 103 thread views #302775

Bard spotting on Bluesky 23 September 2024 :marseyrandom:

Here we spot wild Bardfinn Bluesky activities.

Be valid and ping ! bardfinn for something worthwhile or create a new thread.

7
Hot Old Top Bottom Controversial Random
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

View entire discussion

Erin Biba (@erinbiba.bsky.social):

LOL

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:nvfznp5ls3wcf6aktlfkfkp3/bafkreibvy4b4ar4bjkgihoz73sg3da56oqfrq67i7rr5ffs52upbuh5dtq@jpeg

Sean Eric Stragan (@kithrup.bsky.social):

That's not quite how it was described -- what's going to happen is that if you block account $fascist, then $fascist will not be able to interact with you -- you won't see their posts, but they will still be able to see yours.

chelsea bridge, tetrachromancer 🏳️⚧️ (@secretaboutbox.bsky.social):

that isn't a block, that's a mute.

Sean Eric Stragan (@kithrup.bsky.social):

Yes. But it still means they cannot interact with you.

It doesn't mean that you will see the blocked account's posts, which is what I was pointing out as wrong.

Sage 🏳️⚧️🇧🇷🏳️🌈 (@trans.bsky.social):

oh, so then the functionality is asymmetrical & a harasser can continue to stalk you. Very cool.

silly guy!!! (@nasso.dev):

blocking someone never truly prevented someone from seeing your posts, it just made it more annoying (you just need an alt)

chelsea bridge, tetrachromancer 🏳️⚧️ (@secretaboutbox.bsky.social):

people love to keep trotting this out like none of us knows what an alt is, but the reality is that friction matters

you can't stop determined attackers but a little friction drastically reduces problematic bullshit

chelsea bridge, tetrachromancer 🏳️⚧️ (@secretaboutbox.bsky.social):

the best testimonial i've seen so far for bluesky's cauterizing block behavior is the terf holocaust denier from today complaining about how it shuts him down

Ms. Penny Oaken (@skywitches.net):

Also, because "circumventing a technological access control to exceed authorised access" is both a flat TOS violation & arguably a felony, and escalations of harassment behaviour involve circumventing a block, T&S don't need to understand what the beef is, just that User A circumvented to harass B

Ms. Penny Oaken (@skywitches.net):

Context Free TOS Violation Assessment
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.