Bard spotting on Bluesky 26 November 2024

Cooper Lund (@cooperlund.online):

I would like to have to opt in because I would like some dumbass with a computer to not steal my voice without asking me, it's pretty simple

terra firma, terra eterna 🚱🌉 (@kavi.bsky.social):

If you don't want open datasets to exist, just say that. This stuff is just intellectually dishonest — obviously you are not going to get opt-ins from millions of people to put together a dataset, that's obviously unfeasible. Do you want to be bombarded with requests to opt in?

terra firma, terra eterna 🚱🌉 (@kavi.bsky.social):

What specific harm are you picturing here?

Cooper Lund (@cooperlund.online):

There doesn't have to be harm for me to not want to have it happen, dumbass. That's a bad frame on the conversation, and probably why you can't understand why people don't want this.

Ellie (@itsellie.bsky.social):

"I'm not harmed but I still don't want it" okay but the question is why should other people care

matthew (@pahuski.com):

people around you certainly should care that you don't understand the concept of consent

Ellie (@itsellie.bsky.social):

Do you realize that not everything needs to be explicitly consented to? You can take pictures of people in public (in the US) without their explicit consent, because being in public implies that they are fine with being photographed. Same here with posts.

Ms. Penny Oaken, SkyWitch (@skywitches.net):

Uh, no.

The BlueSky TOS lets endusers access and use the services.

It doesn't convey any explicit sublicense to the content they find on the service.

Dude copied content off the service.

Without license, without permission from the owners.

Ms. Penny Oaken, SkyWitch (@skywitches.net):

SHOW MORE