Keir Starmer announces terrorism legislation aimed at targeting incels.

Follow: @AFpost

pic.twitter.com/E6vn57djQ9

— AF Post (@AFpost) January 21, 2025

Hopefully they lock this dangerous criminal up

https://old.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/1i4gbn4/more_than_70_arrested_at_palestine_solidarity/

Jews cope that England sucks and they're about to die

https://old.reddit.com/r/Jewish/comments/1i4jdiy/more_than_70_arrested_at_london_protest_against/

Corbyn the arch traitor celebrates

https://old.reddit.com/r/LabourUK/comments/1i4w9t9/jeremy_corbyn_hits_out_at_met_police_over/

Labourites hate Jews

https://old.reddit.com/r/LabourUK/comments/1i4kcln/more_than_70_arrested_at_london_protest_against/

!britbongs !coomers

One for you @Sneedman

Dr Mohammad Siddiqui, 58, from Birmingham pleaded guilty at Southwark Crown Court on 29 October 2024 to a total of 25 offences which included, 11 counts of actual bodily harm, 6 counts of cruelty to a child and 8 counts of administering prescription only medicines contrary to the law. The prosecution was brought because of the methods Siddiqui used which showed a complete disregard to patient health, safety and comfort in private residences between 2014 and 2018.

Between June 2012 and November 2013, Dr Siddiqui provided a private mobile circumcision service whilst working asclinical fellow in paediatric surgery at University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust. In this capacity he was able to source the anaesthetic Bupivacaine Hydrochloride which is a prescription only medication.

In 2015 Siddiqui was 'struck off' the General Medical Council Register after a panel of the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service found him guilty of failures in performing non-therapeutic male circumcisions in the homes of four babies.

Despite having been 'struck off', Dr Siddiqui continued to promote and provide a mobile circumcision service. No longer being considered a 'Health Care Professional' he was able to do so because non-therapeutic male circumcision is unregulated with no requirement to be carried out by a medical practitioner. Dr Siddiqui continued to use Bupivacaine Hydrochloride and carry out circumcisions in unsafe, unsanitary and harmful ways. He advertised his services across the United Kingdom and by appointment performed non-therapeutic male circumcisions on young patients up to the age of 14 in their homes.

An NHS nurse in charge of a women's psychiatric unit has been banned after using racist slurs.

Jaden Rachel Dios Hole called a black colleague the N-word, claimed one worker would receive a sick note from a 'witch doctor' and asked a colleague if he was 'from the plantation'.

The remarks came within a list of offensive comments made by Hole between 2017 and 2020, a disciplinary panel at the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) was told.

Hole was co-chair of the Sussex Partnership LGBT Staff Network, which helps to safeguard the rights of gay and transgender staff at the Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust.

On top of this, the nurse also worked as a ward manager at a women's mental health trauma unit in Chichester.

While apparently intoxicated, Hole called a black colleague 'my n*****' while they were on their way home from a team-building event, the NMC hearing heard.

Hole insisted to the panel that they had not meant to cause offence and that it was a reference to a Snoop Dog song playing on the radio in the car.

However, two staff members inside the vehicle at the time said they had 'no recollection' of the song being played during the journey.

The panel concluded that the remark was 'racially abusive'.

During a different conversation, when a black member of staff was off sick, Hole allegedly told colleagues: 'I wonder which witch doctor she was going to get that sick note from.'

The nurse also allegedly spoke to a colleague using words to the effect: 'Who are you? The man from the plantation?'

Hole has worked in psychiatric healthcare for three decades and was employed at the Sussex Partnership Foundation in 2014, their LinkedIn profile stated.

The nurse was suspended after colleagues reported their behaviour and they were referred to the NMC in May 2021.

Seven charges were then either admitted by Hole or proven following the NMC hearing.

The nurse's lawyer told the panel that his client had shown 'great remorse', adding that they had accepted their conduct fell well below the acceptable standard.

Part of the case was held in private as the defence were concerned the case would be reported as 'a trans-identifying man working on a psychiatric ward who is found to be impaired'.

A spokesperson from the Sussex trust said: 'When the allegations of racism came to light, we acted immediately to investigate.

'We are committed to providing inclusive and anti-racist healthcare services.'

!transphobes

Yesterday I became British. I thought the ceremony will be nationalistic and a bit cringe until the lord mayor of Brighton started his speech with al salamu ‘alaykum pic.twitter.com/s6sC5mTF6u

— Mahdi Zaidan (@mahdizda) January 14, 2025

!nooticers

The overwhelming response to my defence of incest on GB News has been one of disgust: I've been called a pervert thousands of times over. It's water off a duck's back to me.

What is extraordinary is the absence of decent arguments against my liberal position. If reproductive and non-reproductive incest are so bad, why do people resort to personal attacks as opposed to moral arguments? There are two reasons: our evolution has predisposed us to viscerally reject incest; and the moral arguments against incest come unstuck because they risk dreadful consequences.

I fear that the main objection mounted against reproductive incest could ultimately lead to dreadful outcomes, such as state enforced eugenics and even the sterilisation of disabled people.

When the social psychologist Jonathan Haidt asked focus groups about a hypothetical brother and sister who had doubly protected s*x on holiday, he found their response to simply be that it was wrong, even if they couldn't explain why. After stonewalling me at dinner last night, my mum gave the same response to the same question. This intuition is rooted in our evolution which has predisposed us to be this way; it seems likely that those who didn't have a disgust response to incest may have died out at a greater rate if their children were more susceptible to genetic disorders.

But we must be honest that our objection to incest is not rooted in some moral truth; it's a biological quirk. During my appearance on GB News, the hosts Andrew Pierce and Miriam Cates argued that reproductive incestuous marriage is unacceptable because of the risk of 'unnecessary genetic deformation'. The debate was in response to an attempt by a Conservative MP to seek a ban on cousin marriage. But if this ban is aimed at reducing the risk of birth defects in the children of those born into such relationships, then must we also crack down on over-40s from reproducing given that they have too appear to have a heightened risk of having children with birth defects? Few would say that should be the case, so we should be wary of accepting a moral argument which requires it as the next logical step.

There's also another point to make about the children of those born into incestuous relationships: even if these babies are born with birth defects, it seems implausible to say that the harm they may have suffered is worse than if such relationships were banned and they didn't exist at all. Surely existence with a birth defect is better for them than nonexistence? Cates cannot talk about most of the children of incest having 'disadvantages' and propose getting rid of those by banning incest, because, in so doing she stops the specific children of such incest from a specific sperm and specific egg from ever existing. This means that they can never benefit from the elimination of the disadvantages.

What I think Pierce and Cates are getting at is that it is morally better for children as a class to be without birth defects even if no particular child in that group has their interests improved by it, as banning incest ensures the creation of different people.

But if the freedom to procreate can be restricted to improve the genetic stock of the population, despite no one being harmed by incest, we risk treading a dangerous path. It might not be long before some suggest that disabled people with inheritable diseases be sterilised. Why not go further, these people might say, and plan the reproduction of the population to ensure future children can have the best lives possible? A person who has rallied against incest can't cry freedom if they oppose such arguments because they've already denied this value in banning incest.

My concerns here aren't hypothetical. In the United States, the Supreme Court verdict in Buck v Bell in 1927 upheld a state's right to stop some people from reproducing; as a result, 70,000 people were forcefully sterilised. This is the potential conclusion of the reasoning employed by some of my critics. This is wrong, hence, the moral reasoning supporting the incest ban is too.

Why is it wrong though? The deep problem with compulsory eugenics is that it denies the moral fact that each individual exists for his own sake; he does not exist to serve the higher purpose of creating a fuller world of better people. Yet this is being implicitly denied by those against incest. They'd rather children of cousins or siblings didn't exist to enjoy their lives because, their very existence does not help advance this better world. But why? So children can have higher scores on maths tests, run faster in sports races, or not age as poorly in their twilight years? Fine things, I admit, but promoting them does not warrant breaking up marriages because the potential children of them might bring down the average height or total quantity of such things.

Defending incest may be disgusting, but as F.A. Hayek, himself third-cousin-married, once wrote: 'Freedom necessarily means that many things will be done which we do not like.' Underneath some of the opposition to incest appears in my mind to be an unspoken support for compulsory eugenics; these people are likely to be oblivious to its presence, but there it lurks nevertheless. In a liberal society, the individual must be free to pursue their own good in their own way including to marry and have children with whoever they want; a future full of better people be darned. Politicians should accept this wisdom and stay out of the love lives of the people -- after all, it's none of their darned business.

WRITTEN BY

Charles Amos

Charles Amos studied Political Theory at The University of Oxford and writes The Musing Individualist Substack. He tweets https://x.com/mrcharlesamos.

!britbongs Why are you so homophobic? Also why do you treat processed meat like it's funking gourmet food?

Did you know that despite the British Pakistani population being 49,8% male the r*pe gangs were 100% male?

Makes you think, doesn't it?

Reminder that even good-looking Bongs sound ugly, like groaning cattle.

https://old.reddit.com/r/IndiaSpeaks/comments/1huws50/pakistani_citizen_in_uk_politely_explaining_law/

Hindus hate pakis

https://old.reddit.com/r/MurderedByWords/comments/1hux299/she_dropped_a_whole_nuke/

They really hate pakis

https://old.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/1hv432g/barrow_victim_breaks_silence_on_grooming_ordeal/

Cope

https://old.reddit.com/r/DecodingTheGurus/comments/1hv5juy/bari_weisss_paperpublishes_an_article_about_the/

Tories find their own asses too late

https://old.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/1hv6jvk/badenoch_i_was_serious_when_i_said_its_time_to/

Social services would have stopped this!

https://old.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/1hv8x6y/victoria_derbyshire_lists_inquiries_held_into/

Eu is love eu is life

https://old.reddit.com/r/AskBrits/comments/1huyjzc/whats_the_story_with_the_child_grooming_gangs/

https://old.reddit.com/r/uknews/comments/1hu6o18/elon_musks_rants_made_me_sick_says_survivor_of/

Get r*ped by pakis with me!

https://old.reddit.com/r/Destiny/comments/1hu80d4/drew_pavlou_on_the_british_grooming_gangs/

The cute twinks of britain clutch their monocles and china tea cups

https://old.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/1hufq1p/keir_starmer_to_defend_grooming_gangs_record_amid/

Keir starmer is their leader and proud of it

https://old.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/comments/1hu8u6l/the_triggernometry_guys_interview_a_grooming_gang/

Real journ*lism served up piping hot

https://old.reddit.com/r/DecodingTheGurus/comments/1huwln8/what_is_the_whole_groominggang_thing_about/

Cope cope cope cope

https://old.reddit.com/r/EnoughMuskSpam/comments/1huf99d/england_dont_let_this_manbaby_in_a_khole_do_to/

Manbaby

https://old.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/1huwhgx/britains_grooming_gangs_scandal_is_shattering_the/