a lot of days, I make a shitton of changes in successsion, and I don't wanna make the whole frontpage my changelog posts, so I don't post about them
this thread solves that, so from now on instead of making changelog posts, I'll make changelog comments here
click subscribe on this thread to get notified of changes 
on desktop:
on mobile:
Edit: I'm still not gonna post about bugfixes tho, theres way too many
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jesus Christ lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
its a fricking little cpu-intensive so it has to be exclusive
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Just optimize???
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
how would u optimize a fricking css animation
!codecels
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Lmao
@Murdervann you are literally the worst
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
fixed king
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What about my incredibly naive suggestion? The perfect solution?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i cant understand what ur saying
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The performance problem arises from the animations being calculated separately, so the solution is to calculate only once.
You'd have to parse the html so you could count the number of nested bounce/cides, then wrap the section in a single div with a single css animation.
It wouldn't work for any of the interesting cases of nesting, though, like whirlpool 'cides where the innermost marsey is spinning like crazy
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
In general though a
bounce>cide>bounce>marseycould be flattened to a2bounce1cide>marseyJump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
https://fsdfsd.net/rDrama/rDrama/pulls/211
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
cpu usage seems to be the fricking same for me
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i wasnt able to integration test it because rdrama dev machine broke. on my test page, this decreased the style recalculation time. can you create a minimum reproduceable example, one with the high CPU usage??
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
elaborate
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Why do you have to use CSS
The site renders normal gifs all the time just generate a glowing name gif and display that
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
by removing it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Have you tried implementing it in c?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
?nocss=true
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Looking at the animation for it, it would probably be less cpu intensive if implemented with a filter property instead of a color property, idk if that's doable, maybe hue rotate
Also this exists if you don't have any other option: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/will-change
I'll look tomorrow during lunch and see if I can speed it up
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
ty
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I spent like 40 minutes trying to reproduce this issue and I couldn't. Do you have a minimum reproduceable example? Also you owe me my 40 minutes back.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Depends on the animation https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Performance/Animation_performance_and_frame_rate
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
RuneScape had 1000 people at the GE doing : glow2 : at the same time in like 2006
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
games are fricking different from websites
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm just teasing u bb
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context