Unable to load image
/h/changelog House Furry
Merryvann capy/bara world's largest rodent  3yr ago (text post) 480 thread views #23544

added 35 marseys and 5 misc emojis :marseycapywalking:

many thanks to the creators, pls tell me if u dont have the marsey badge

also dont forget to post any future marsey u make here so I can add them https://rdrama.net/post/22479/megathread-posts-here-marseys-or-other :marseycapywalking:

36
New Old Top Bottom Controversial Random
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

View entire discussion

For clarification's sake in this comment :marseycapywalking: is on screen at all times?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@Stranger @X (formerly chiobu) okay i added back "width" but limited "width" and "height" to 250px max like @ArachnoLibrarian suggested, let me know what u think :marseycapy:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyblowkiss:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyangel:

:marseyghost:

:marseyrope:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@Aevann is it intentional that putting height above 250 puts it to a lower value than 250?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@Aevann is it intentional that putting height above 250 puts it to a lower value than 250?

It just removes the attribute, and then I guess you see the value computed from the size of the content. I couldn't find a way to replace the value of the attribute with a sanitized value using bleach.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Those sure are words

:marseyspecialpat:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

When you post a comment it goes through a sanitizer which decides which tags and attributes to allow. The sanitizer library that rdrama uses allows us to add custom logic besides just checking whitelisted attributes, but this logic must still return a simple yes/no answer to whether the attribute should be allowed. So when you specify width=251 our function says "no", the attribute is removed, your browser computes width as if it were not specified and that's the value smaller than 250 that you see when doing inspect element.

So no this is not "by design" but I for one see zero reasons to put any effort into fixing it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I see, I'm just used to basically every program etc will automatically reduce the value you input to the max allowed value but I have no understanding of the mechanics behind that.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

idk lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

no it disappears on the right hand side a bunch of times, I see what u mean now

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I like the effect for that comment but it seems to happen with every comment that fricks with nested alternate marqees of different directions or whatever you call it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.