added the "view source" button to posts too

Do you have a source on that? Source? A source. I need a source. Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion. No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered. You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence. Do you have a degree in that field? A college degree? In that field? Then your arguments are invalid. No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION. You still haven't provided me a valid source yet. Nope, still haven't. I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.

!blackjack4000

requested by @Sneed https://rdrama.com/comment/1221761?context=9#context

Source status: viewed.

@everyone status: trans lives matter.

!blackjack1000

Testing.

Dang, can't hide marseys in marquee tags. That would be a bug if it did render a marsey wouldn't it? Very cool addition, I wondered how those crazy moving emojis were done.

Neat!

Find the secret message!

Wgere is it?

!slots122

The last time I heard of an Egyptian chad doing so much to take initiative and proactively solve engineering problems, it's that guy who showed they could use pressurized water to cut down the Israeli berms on the canal in '73. I'm amazed at how despite all the pink and gay porn and memes and stuff, this site seems to be run way more professionally than reddit.

I'm not providing you with studies because it's a stupid question. That's like saying "prove to me white women frick dogs." It doesn't need a study or evidence to be proven.

Snapshots:

https://rdrama.com/comment/1221761?context=9#context:

• archive.org
• archive.ph (click to archive)