Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

EDIT 2022-05: A corrected version of this comment is available here.


I love the transparency with features like this. Reddit sold out a long time ago in that regard (e.g: removing the ability to see upmarseys and downmarseys independently for a comment).

However, you forgot to implement the feature I mentioned a while back to normalize the points. To recap (with extra clarification), it would also be interesting to see the data as a proportion of total comments made by the person receiving the votes. For example if someone's made a million comments (like LLM), then 40 downmarseys or upmarseys given to him (by say, me) is barely anything. I'm hardly a simp. On the other hand, if someone's only made a hundred comments in total, but that person has been upmarseyd (or downmarseyd) 20 times by me, that's very significant, and makes me a giant simp for that user. The "haters" section is similar but with downmarseys of course. That would really spice things up as you might imagine.

That's "Simps" and "Haters" covered. As for the "Simps for", and "Hates" section, well, you're apparently the third biggest user I simp for. But you do post more than most people, so perhaps your comments have caught my eye and made me upmarsey you more simply because of that, so we should divide the score by the total number of comments you made for a fairer comparison.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Impressive. Normally people with such severe developmental disabilities struggle to write much more than a sentence or two. He really has exceded our expectations for the writing portion. Sadly the coherency of his writing, along with his abilities in the social skills and reading portions, are far behind his peers with similar disabilities.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.