>communists were very dangerous and threatened the entire world by turning perfectly working states into failed nations that can't do anything but invade other nations and turn them into shitholes by force
Because Joseph "Please anyone but Stalin" Stalin took over the party against Lenin's last will and Trotsky's idealism and turned Russia into an industrial powerhouse while keeping any "true communist" in check thanks to his ultra-totalitarian terror state
True Glorious Communism is just "capitalism but like the feds run a bank or something idk lol", as demonstrated by Lenin, Deng, and every other functional example of communism.
syscoshillre/heat
Rdrama's official Sysco® rep! Ask me about Sysco®
arseupwrongo 7mo ago#6405683
spent 0 currency on pings
Turns out it's easier to leave a trail of destruction and misery than make things better. What a paradox that communism can do the former but not the latter! I hope we eventually solve this conundrum.
So communists destroyed their industry and progress, but in order to destroy their industry, then development of that industry needs to happen in the first place, which is impossible under communism because communism can only destroy so...
Despite this, it was American architects and engineers that gave the Soviets the advanced designs and technology they needed to build “socialism in one country,” constructing the industrial base that would one day defeat Nazi Germany.
You really can't deny that Russia vs Germany -- excluding the rest of everyone else in WW2 -- was the biggest war ever fought and that Russia won, despite how much they suck. They're just big.
QarTIRF/CHAD
You are now breathing manually. You are now blinking manually. You are now swallowing manually.
arseupwrongo 7mo ago#6405789
spent 0 currency on pings
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
>communism is a failed system that can't do anything
Schrodinger's something
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Boom.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!r-slurs
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Let's face it, the Russian nation simply cannot comprehend a form of politics that isn't completely wingcucked, authoritarian, and hyper polarized.
Dang mongols messed them up real good!
!grillers
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Slavs would still be living like rabbits in the forest except they hired Nordics to create the Kievan Rus state and rule them.
If you want your country run right, there's only one race that can.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Russia had a liberal democracy for a few months before they Bolsheviks overthrew them
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
How did a failed nation take over a perfectly working state so easily?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Because Joseph "Please anyone but Stalin" Stalin took over the party against Lenin's last will and Trotsky's idealism and turned Russia into an industrial powerhouse while keeping any "true communist" in check thanks to his ultra-totalitarian terror state
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
True Glorious Communism is just "capitalism but like the feds run a bank or something idk lol", as demonstrated by Lenin, Deng, and every other functional example of communism.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
with complete disregard for the lives of their citizens and soldiers.
when you tell millions of soldiers either take over this country or die trying. if you retreat you'll be shot. it's gonna work.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
they turn failed nations into failed nations with cool military parades.
lets be honest qing china, tzarist russia, Batista's cuba ect were shitholes that's why they were desperate enough to try communism.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Turns out it's easier to leave a trail of destruction and misery than make things better. What a paradox that communism can do the former but not the latter! I hope we eventually solve this conundrum.
!anticommunists
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So communists destroyed their industry and progress, but in order to destroy their industry, then development of that industry needs to happen in the first place, which is impossible under communism because communism can only destroy so...
!commies help me out with this riddle
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
LOL, yes:
!anticommunists
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If Russia had an industrial base then how did 1.5 million Russians get encircled in 1941-42
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You really can't deny that Russia vs Germany -- excluding the rest of everyone else in WW2 -- was the biggest war ever fought and that Russia won, despite how much they suck. They're just big.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Because it wasn't based enough.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Communists are effective like the Columbine shooters.
!McCarthyists
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Both things are not mutually exclusive. They were dangerous and their system sucked balls. Living through commie collapse wasn't fun either
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Communism is like an r-slur with a loaded gun.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context