Even when it comes to stuff that's a bit more grounded, like transcripts of speeches, obviously what's written down is gonna be an idealized version of what was actually said.
That doesn't make it useless of course. It just shifts how it should be read. Reading history the way someone wants us to read it still tells us about the author's views.
1. Disrespect towards God and the Church is not allowed here.
2. We honor the dignity of life from the womb to the tomb.
3. Debate about Scripture, tradition, politics, etc. are allowed when they do not directly contradict rule 1 (controversial history is an open topic when people are respectful).
4. Trolling, coomerisms, and poorly attempted humor may receive the mop at the discretion of those in charge.
5. Pray for your family, pray for your community, pray for your nation, and pray for rDrama.net. We need it! Prayer works!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I'm assuming you take this stance with all other works of antiquity, yes.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Even when it comes to stuff that's a bit more grounded, like transcripts of speeches, obviously what's written down is gonna be an idealized version of what was actually said.
That doesn't make it useless of course. It just shifts how it should be read. Reading history the way someone wants us to read it still tells us about the author's views.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context