Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>I'm sorry for taking swipes at you.

It's cool. @Bookers is not even on some total chud crusade, @Bookers just like Latin mass and @Bookers is fricking annoyed.

>Personally, @Bookers is not actually thrilled about the restrictions because @Bookers consider it heavy-handed and there's nothing wrong with the Latin Rite liturgy.

Like, this is how @Bookers feel about it.

As far the other stuff, @Bookers don't even care. If Rome said tomorrow that homosexuals could get married in the church @Bookers wouldn't bat an eye.

@Bookers just think it's dumb that they're like Yeah homosexuals can get married, but don't you dare read the sermon in latin.

Israeli lives matter

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Shouldn't that be a concern :marseywoozy: though?

I personally don't care what gay people do/ have gay friends/ etc.

  • But there :marseycheerup: is clear indication that homosexuality :marseynyanlgbt: is a sin. That said so is lying :marseydeception: and a million :marseysamhyde2: other things and all sin is equal :marseyjustice: in the eyes of god and all that.

  • If Christians pastors/priests/etc. bless a homosexual :marseysalutenavy: union :marseyangelamerkel: it is directly going :marseysalmaid: against the word of god for the sake of inclusion.

  • Priests shouldn't condone sin much less give it their blessing right? Whether it's lying, murder, blasphemy, homosexuality, adultery, etc. Idk just seems wrong :marseyakshually: to me.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Idk maybe they should, maybe they shouldn't.

It doesn't effect me so I don't really give a shit.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.