https://old.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/18x83oq/according_to_the_bible_the_following_people
- Homosexuals.
- Lesbians.
- Trans.
- Homoparental families.
- Lesboparental families.
- Diverse families.
- Adulterers.
- Fornicators.
- Those who live in a free union.
- The civilly married.
- The divorced and remarried.
- The divorced who live in common law.
- Those who have children outside of marriage.
- Those who do not recognize children.
- Those who have had s*x with a woman with menstruation.
- Those who have slept with their neighbor's wife (cheating).
- Those who do not keep the Sabbath for the Lord
- The drunks.
- Those who visit prostitutes.
- The practitioners of onanism
- Those who adore images.
- Those who sow and gather the fallen fruits.
- Those who participate in games of chance (lottery, Christmas, lotto, scratch cards).
- Those who steal (even if it is a pencil).
- Those who have impure thoughts and desires.
- Those who swear in vain.
- Those who covet other people's goods.
- Those who lie.
- Those who cheat.
- Those who swear falsely.
- Those who do not sanctify the holidays (go to the beach at Easter).
- Those who oppress and deprive others.
- Those who issue unfair sentences.
- Those who do favors for the poor.
- Those who slander others.
- Those who hate the brother.
- The spiteful ones.
- Those who take revenge.
- Those who sow their fields with two different kinds of grain.
- Those who wear clothes woven with threads of two kinds.
- Those who practice witchcraft and astrology (read the horoscope).
- Those who shave their head round.
- Those who cut the edges of their beard.
- Those with tattoos on their body.
- Those who consult witches.
- Those who do not stand up to the elderly.
- Those who charge úsura interest (garroteras).
- They make idols and raise statues and monuments.
- Those who criticize.
- Those who use contraceptive methods.
- Those who have s*x before marriage.
- Those who have s*x for non-reproductive purposes.
- Those who have s*x for pleasure.
- Those who eat shrimp.
I'll see ALL of you in heck 😂😂😂🙋♂️
besides the fact that none of these are true, which ones are u in for, dramanauts?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The Bible doesn't say that jerking off is wrong.
Onan's older brother died without having kids, making Onan now the heir to his dead brother's birthright.
Onan was commanded to frick his dead brother's widow to raise children that would count as his dead brother's kids, who would become the first-male heirs to the birthright.
Onan didn't want to lose the opportunity to inherit the birthright by cucking himself with his dead brother's wife, so he pulled out and shot his c*m outside of her vagoogoo.
This deception and attempt to obtain the birthright is why God killed Onan.
Of course Jacob jewing Esau out of his birthright over some porridge because he was starving to death after a long trek away from home is totally kosher, and Jacob wearing lamb skin to impersonate Esau's hairy arms, disguising his voice, and lying to his father Isaac that he was Esau so he could obtain the ritual of inheritance is totally okay to do.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Is onanism different from masturbation? When I googled it that's what it said onanism was
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The story of Onan got twisted into being about how you aren't supposed to masturbate, so you're correct that Onanism means masturbation. But it's foundationally wrong.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Not really, it's the spilling of seed in vain - in Judaism, the sin was the disobedience towards God, not jerking off. In Christianity, it is in theory still a sin since to lust after one is not really any different from fornicating.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I'm pretty sure I read scholars are confident the story of Onan came after the legal practice of dead-brother-wife-fricking was already in place for a couple centuries as justification.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Like, they wrote the story to retcon the existing rule?
I'd believe it. Isaac kills Jacob in the original story (Jahwist author). It even describes him coming down by himself after. Later authors (Elohist) add sacrificing the ram instead. Also a retcon to justify the end of human sacrifice.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah, from what I understand, I mean you need a pretty solid rational for a legal practice that r-slurred.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context