or 
?
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1784451729331032186.html
I know very little about Henry VIII like why would anyone study bong history - and I'm more partial to the idea that English reformers within the Catholic Church manipulated Mr. #8 to create the Church of England they wanted, what do drama historians think about this thread?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I don't know much about Henry VIII either, but I definately trust an anonymous nobody on Xitter who believes the first Emperor of China (Qin Shi Huang) was European.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It's bait.
If it's meant to be serious, then it's fricking stupid. Catherine could not be heir to the English throne simply by marrying Arthur or Henry. The rest of it is just as dumb. Henry VII (Henry VIII's dad) wouldn't let Catherine return home to Spain after Arthur's death because he was fighting with her father about the dowry and wanted to keep her (and her dowry) with him. That's why he later married her to Henry, for the money and alliance. Mary did not kill her half-brother Edward. It's not history and it's not even a fun conspiracy theory.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I figured
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I love Showtimes The Tudors that Henry VIII actor is so fun to watch
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
So modern academia is the structural progeny of the historical Catholic church, and the current culture war is some secret society shit? Them vs the new world order set forth by the heirs of Tudor?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Snapshots:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1784451729331032186.html:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context