The plaintiffs alleged that Coca-Cola bottlers "contracted with or otherwise directed paramilitary security forces that utilized extreme violence and murdered, tortured, unlawfully detained, or otherwise silenced trade union leaders." Coca-Cola does not deny that the murders and attacks on unionists took place at their bottling facilities, nor did they deny that the paramilitaries responsible for the killings were being paid by the bottlers, but they claimed that they could not be held liable because they are not in direct control of the bottling plants. In March 2001, district judge Jose E. Martinez decided in Miami that Coca-Cola could not be held liable, claiming they did not directly control the bottling plants, but allowed the case against the bottling companies to proceed forward
Coca-Cola death squads (1990-2002)
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2003/jul/24/marketingandpr.colombia
- 3
- 15
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What'd the base rate of murders and union membership look like in Columbia? Was this one of those trans situations where they yell about murder numbers that are actually lower than you'd expect, or was there actually a targetted campaign of murder against union members (understandable, tbh).
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context