the ick i get when a man mentions going to therapy or having anxiety is unreal like it makes me feel sick lmao. like why are u telling me that
— Kendall (@Kenny___Rose) June 12, 2023
Context
Might be a bait tweet, but the seethe is real
Drama
Congratulations you're the worst
What about the men who went to war, came home broken, and now go to therapy so they can get through life? Are they allowed to have anxiety or go to therapy? Because some of them thought they weren’t supposed to and now a lot do them aren’t here anymore.
Lmao just get over it sweaty
Gay men also reject other men for this, unfortunately. It makes me want to hold everything inside and never show vulnerability to anyone anymore, or I'm not "manly" enough. God forbid men aren't confident and strong 100% of the time, that we have issues we're working through.
Some of these entitled immature bishes gonna get wake up call one of these days. They won't always get away with being psychopaths just cause they superficial cute. Its all fun and games til somebody gets punched in the face. Just sayin'.
Scrotes fantasizing about getting violent with women when they disagree with them
You are a grown man with a nose piercing
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, you don't talk about it, but you clearly do take great pleasure in it. There's a huge gap between your words and your actions. The only difference between us in this regard is that you virtue-signal constantly in order to try and mask your sociopathy, whereas I don't believe in virtue-signalling at all because our society is currently moving beyond the need for such self-delusion. There is no value in wearing a mask to fit in with society when society itself is starting to unmask. Virtue-signalling is an outdated construct and that why our elites are losing their moral authority: because by now practically everybody can see through their hypocritical lies.
Your pretense of morality is laughable. The reason I'm much more trustworthy than you is because I'm at least honest about my beliefs and values, and people can count on me to consistently uphold those values, without any of the convenient "exceptions" or excuses that you constantly use.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You talk all the time about bringing people into your movements under, if not deceitful pretenses, then cynically presented one’s that you might not hold personally.
I feel like I’m pretty straightforward, I got principles and when necessary I have priorities. And they lean toward stability and the general safety of others.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Your principles are worthless since you violate them whenever you have an excuse. People can't trust you at all because you will violate your principles whenever convenient simply by doing some tortuous mental gymnastics about how you need to make an exception because it's "necessary for stability" or "the general safety of others." You're a greedy self-aggrandizing psychopath who masquerades as a human being in order to gain the trust of clueless normies.
My principles are valuable because I never violate them, even when they cause me great inconvenience. People can trust me because I will always live up to my stated principles without any exceptions. I'm a greedy self-aggrandizing person also, but I don't try to hide this fact like you do: on the contrary, I'm very upfront about it - and that makes me far more trustworthy and human than you.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If that were the case, why am I a peacemaker?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Killing people who disagree with you doesn't seem like peacemaking to me
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Only those with a willingness to employ violence when all other reasonable approaches are exhausted can actually pursue peace.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Translation: "I'm less persuasive than you, so I need to use violence to suppress your point of view!"
But that's totally OK, because I'm sure you'll come up with some facile excuse like saying that my free speech is "A ThReAt To DeMoCrAcY!"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Just to be clear to the first point, yes. I believe I already made it clear but just to be doubly so, if something is horrible and wrong, and a charismatic individual happens to have a positional advantage with a crowd, violence to suppress them is valuable.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
OK, so basically you're the real threat to democracy: thank you for admitting it. Isn't it refreshing for you to finally take the mask off and show yourself as the psychopath that you truly are instead of having to do all this hollow virtue-signalling and pretending that you give a shit about democracy or morality? You basically just want your team to remain in power and you're willing to kill anybody like myself who threatens that. All this nonsense where you label me a violent psychopath is basically just projection.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
That’s correct, but not all use cases of the potential for violence in pursuit of peace.
That’s to say, you’re right but there’s also things like dissuading those that cannot be swayed from violence with words alone.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes, I already covered this when I said "facile excuse".
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context