Unable to load image
/h/femaledatingstrategy House Furry Founder
grizzly glow/bear :marseybear:  1mo ago (scientificamerican.com) 320 thread views #311110

Here's What the 'Manosphere' Gets Wrong about Cuckoldry | Scientific American

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/heres-what-the-manosphere-gets-wrong-about-cuckoldry/
30
New Old Top Bottom Controversial Random
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://archive.ph/KTsOa

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

have adopted the term cuck as a more general synonym for weakness, desperation and foolishness.

It's more fundamental than that, it's valuing someone else's selfish benefit more than your own, the more they are unlike you. It's more than just universalist and non-egoist sentiment, it's actively anti-self.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It is the final and ultimate manifestation of slave morality

:marseynietzsche:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The entire premise is "Man degrades other man. Women most affected." And she doesn't get the origin in the popularization of the insult: porn. It's not about "men secretly being cheated on", but men willingly and publicly degrading themselves as inferior based on gender and sometimes race.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The article makes it clear the journ*list's entire knowledge of the manosphere comes from listening to other journ*lists describe what they imagine it to be.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I assume it's just this in article form

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17298999569624355.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>But this use distorts its history and meaning, creating a baseless moral panic that harms both women and science

:sciencejak: Got that chud?? Every time you call someone a cuck online you are attacking Science itself!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is an opinion and analysis article, and the views expressed by the author or authors are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

nah, i aint reading that

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

tldr: Science says "real" cuckoldry rarely happens, but when it does it's actually a good thing. :soysmug: :sciencejak:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

In online forums the term "cuck" has become synonymous with "sucker" and "loser." But this use distorts its history and meaning,

https://media.tenor.com/0I7mMBnhS7UAAAAx/hayasaka-kaguya-sama.webp

TJD now

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Come the frick on dude

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyfluffydemon:

Snapshots:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/heres-what-the-manosphere-gets-wrong-about-cuckoldry/:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.