Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not very dramatic, but that was actually a pretty fair evaluation of the whole mess.

:#marseythumbsup:

The bottom line is what most people already know however: Bud Light isn't very good, so when they pissed off their customers it was super easy for them to switch products.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

yeah, if magnum suddenly had an lgbt :marseytrain:on the box, theyd probably face less decreassed sales bc rheir product is quality. They probaably wouldnt do that tho bc they like to have quality advertising too

https://media.tenor.com/3mEk9M7_LgEAAAAx/kareena-kapoor-madak.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yep, those were good times for rDrama

:marseyboomer:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Literally nobody likes Dylan mulveny lol. Even other :marseytrain2:s think his bit goes too far

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

A more logical conclusion is that most people aren't real in general.

Snapshots:

https://hbr.org/2024/03/lessons-from-the-bud-light-boycott-one-year-later:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Taking a social stance has become a rite of passage for contemporary brands that are hoping to resonate with younger, more socially-conscious audiences. In April 2023, Bud Light tried its hand at this strategy, collaborating with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney on a social media promotional post. This sparked backlash from several prominent conservatives, leading many conservative figures and groups to call for a boycott of Bud Light.

Is the page not loading right for me or is this it?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.