Unable to load image
Reported by:

German Parliament To Review Petition To Make "Pedosexuality" A Legally Protected Identity

https://reduxx.info/exclusive-german-parliament-to-review-petition-to-make-pedosexuality-a-legally-protected-identity/

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17273890342500813.webp

Germany's parliament will be reviewing proposed amendments submitted by a pro-p-dophile group tomorrow, sparking concerns from child safeguarding advocates. Krumme-13, a lobby group which advocates for lowering the age of consent and legalizing child pornography, is seeking to add language to the constitution which would establish "pedosexuality" as a protected sexual identity.

Dieter Gieseking, the founder of Krumme-13, announced the upcoming vote to his supporters in a post made to the group's website last week.

"K13online calls for a ban on discrimination against gays and lesbians AND p-dophiles in the constitution," reads the statement. "The vote… will be broadcast live on Parliamentary TV."

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17273890343570485.webp

Translated from the original German.

The post highlights the fact that Krumme-13 intends to continue to pressure the government to normalize pedophilia via the Bundestag's petition process, a strategy that the p-dophile activists have undertaken for several years.

"We are already announcing further petitions on topic-relevant areas. The topic of pedophilia / pedosexuality must constantly be in the political debate. The human rights of this sexual minority are becoming ever more restricted. The political fight for acceptance and recognition will never end. The new generation of p-dophile-loving people is just growing up," he wrote.

Krumme-13 appears to have been emboldened by the success of a previous petition drafted by Gieseking on "children's rights."

Last October, the Bundestag accepted an amendment written by the pro-p-dophile advocate which would alter Article 6, Paragraph 2 of the Basic Law to state that "the child's well-being is paramount".

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17273890345600195.webp

Correspondences from the German government to pro-p-dophile advocate Dieter Gieseking, informing him that his petition calling for "pedosexuality" to be a protected identity would be reviewed by the Petitions Committee.

However, further elaboration holds that children ought to be treated as "legal subjects" and have a right to have "a say in all matters concerning their spiritual, mental and physical well-being, as well as the right to freely develop their personality."

Gieseking made certain to point out to his followers on his website that the intended implication of the phrase is to create a legal framework for establishing sexuality as a children's right. The phrase "sexual self-determination" is included in Article 2 of the Basic Law under the conditions of the "free development of personality."

"Sexual self-determination (also for children) is derived from the free development of the personality in Article 2," Gieseking wrote in 2021. As a reference, the petition as well as the German Bundestag both cite the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. The Krumme-13 petition was was supported by representatives of the Socialist Democrats, Free Democratic Party, and Green Party.

In April of this year, Gieseking shared the news that his petition to include the "sexual identity of p-dophiles" as a protected characteristic under the constitution had been approved for discussion by the Petitions Committee.

"The petition service of the German Bundestag announced that the petition 'Sexual Identity in the Basic Law', which also includes the sexual identity of p-dophiles, will be discussed as an individual petition within the committee. There will therefore be a separate recommendation for a resolution. The Petitions Committee has thus complied with the petitioner's request."

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17273890347634137.webp

Translated from the original German.

"In addition to all of the proposed children's rights, sexual self-determination must also be protected and included in the Basic Law," reads a K13online blog post about the petition dated July 2022.

Gieseking has repeatedly claimed that his campaigns to have pedophilia protected as a sexual identity are not equivalent to legalizing child sexual abuse. The activists of K13online have been demanding that the "p-dophile [sexual] identity" be "protected from discrimination, criminalization, exclusion and persecution" under Germany's equality laws.

"Pedophilia must also be included in sexual identity. P-dophiles in particular must be fundamentally protected from discrimination in the Basic Law. And this is completely independent of sexual criminal law. The vast majority of the estimated 250,000 p-dophiles do not commit any of these types of crimes. Pedophilia is a separate sexual identity."

Again, in April, the p-dophile advocate stated that the "p-dophile identity in the GG (Basic Law) is not about the legalization of consensual sexuality between children and adults," thereby reiterating his belief that children can consent to sexual activity. "It's about protecting the p-dophile identity from discrimination and thus the recognition and acceptance of p-dophiles as a sexual minority."

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17273890349279177.webp

Translated from the original German.

Yet his claims contradict other actions and positions advocated for by Krumme-13. In another petition he sent to the government, Gieseking called for the decriminalization of the possession and distribution of child pornography.

"Legalizing clearly self-determined sexuality between older people and those under 14 is the best protection against actual sexual violence against children," Gieseking wrote, while calling for the abolition of Sections 176 [Sexual Abuse of Children] and 188 [Dissemination, Acquisition and Possession of Child Pornographic Content] of the legal code.

Gieseking advocates for a distinction to be made between "sexual consent" and "sexual violence" when it comes to sexual acts between adults and children. As it is his belief that children can consent to s*x with adults, he promotes the view that only the latter should be criminalized.

Gieseking, a 68-year-old former Federal Border Guard official, founded K13 in Trier in 1993 and promoted the group as a "self-help" organization for "pedosexuals." He has been repeatedly charged with the possession of child pornography.

In 1996, Gieseking was sentenced to eighteen months, for which he served one year in prison, on charges related to operating a mail order child pornography service from a van. In 2003, Gieseking again appeared in court accused of possession of child sexual abuse materials obtained between July 1999 and January 2001. The pornography was found on Gieseking's computer after a search of his residence in August 2001. His devices contained a total of 216 image files of naked children, and he was sentenced to eight months in prison.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17273890351037204.webp

Pro-p-dophile advocate Dieter Gieseking

At the time, Gieseking was also accused of linking to a child pornography page on his website. This link was discovered by jugendschutz.net, an organization set up by the federal government to protect minors online.

In a 2014 interview with Taz Online, Gieseking called for lowering the age of consent to 12 years of age, and said that adult sexual interactions with toddlers would have to be "discussed separately."

"The taboo of pedophilia must finally be broken at all levels of society. If a p-dophile can come out without fear of exclusion or even demonization, then this is the best prevention against child abuse," Gieseking told the outlet.

In accordance with his views on children's ability to consent, Gieseking has publicly endorsed Germany's new gender self-identification law, which takes effect November 1 and allows parents to change the s*x marker on their children's documents from birth. From the age of five years old, it allows for name and s*x changes if there is "mutual consent" between the child and their parents.

"Why is gender identity also politically important for p-dophiles/pedosophists?" Gieseking wrote in a post to K13online. "Gender and sexual identity does not only begin on the 14th birthday, when the so-called protection age limit ends. Children can and want to experience their childhood sexuality self-determined beforehand."

Judeo-Bolshevik "hate crime" laws are, in the American prison system, used to enhance the penalties against anyone who targets s*x offenders. If you put your hands on a child molester, that's a "hate crime". In fact, even harassing s*x offenders can get you charged with "hate crimes", which will get several more years added to your sentence. As I've said before, s*x offenders are given the five-star treatment by the feds. S*x offender-friendly yards are always the nicest yards with the best living conditions, while yards where s*x offenders aren't permitted to walk are always shitholes, and the feds go absolutely out of their way to protect s*x offenders. As such, it is not even remotely difficult to imagine something like this eventually finding its way to America as well.

This push to legitimize "pedosexuality" might look like a fringe movement now, but so was, less than 10 years ago, the idea of "transitioning" kids (which, of course, is pushed by the exact same people). The only solution:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17273890355524335.webp

!pedohunters !germs

60
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sounds like balloney pinging in the expert @UraniumDonGER

Just skimming in because i dont care that much but the wording seems like the group simply submitted a draft and the court has to "review" it (read: reject with a majority vote) because it got enough signatures or such (not sure what the exact cases for accepting law draft for review are in germany). It being from reduxx makes it thrice as dubious because they sensualize everything with confusing wording to get rage clicks

Edit: The group was literally dissolved 20 years ago and repeatedly punished and rejected. Its just a schizo p-dophile submitting drafts that never get accepted: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krumme_13

!nonchuds

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is the collection of petitions that the parliament discussed. Search for file number Pet 4-19-07-103-044636. This file number is also referenced in the article. Funnily enough it has been filed as Grundrechte (fundamental rights). You can see that there are four types of Beschlussempfehlung:

Beschlussempfehlung 1: petition process completed because because the concerns have been partially met

Beschlussempfehlung 2: petition process completed because because the concerns have been met

Beschlussempfehlung 3: petition process completed because most of the concerns could not be met

Beschlussempfehlung 4: petition process completed (which is a nice way of saying that these petitions are r-slurred. You can tell because all petitions from austria are in this category)

This petition was added to category 4.

Additionally, you can see that this is the collection #641 (Sammelübersicht 641) and it has 95 petitions. I'd estimate there have been about 60.000 petitions up until 11.09.2024.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So if i understand corectly it was basically "discussed" and postponed indefinitely because its r-slurred and not worth the time? So :marseynothingburger: like i said

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes, it's like articles about outrageous lawsuits being filed, when anyone can file a lawsuit.

The interesting parts were the getting language in to parliament as a potential wedge for the argument for children to consent, and the numerous rather lax sentences for the man who watched and sold child pornography.

Oh, and that parents of kids as young as five can freely change the name and s*x markers of their children 'with consultation of the child', from November 1st in Germany. A good age to define your life as being spent in the wrong body, I'd say.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

because it got enough :marseyitsallsotiresome: signatures or such

The fricking fact they were fricking willing :marseywould: to sign that means they're not living :marseyjumpscare: in fear as they should

!chuds

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I have no idea how submitting drafts works in germany they might as well just need to pay upfront and your draft "Make BIPOCkilling legal" will reach the court

Thats why i pinged the germxpert

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyitsallsotiresome#:

Why do you tards ping me when its about wood chipper shit.

I still looked it up. This is the online petition:

https://www.openpetition.de/petition/online/kinderrechte-und-sexuelle-identitaet-ins-grundgesetz-gg#petition-main

It got signed by 37 sub humans (@Griffith_Fanboy is right). In contrast the current top petition about knifes has over 100,000 signers.

I also looked about about the petition laws and it seems that they had 15,000 petitions in 2023. But only 1/4 of them were accepted. BUT!!! If they decline your petition you can still make them re-watch the issue anyway. It doesn't state that you need a minimal number of signers, that's why it probably takes ages until the small petitions finally are reviewed or talked over in the parliament, IF EVER. @TomCruisesBussy pretty much explained it in his comment: https://rdrama.net/h/groomers/post/303506/german-parliament-to-review-petition-to/7079879#context

Also don't forget that reduxx is rad fem, wing cucked shit site. Bussy havers should know better that these wenches would ban bussy if they could so don't take them serious because you have to fact-check their feminist nonsense anyway.

!commenters KILL P-DO! FEMINIST BAD!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wait 37? I assumed he was able to get at least a thousand signatures this is literally just his p-do pals signing. :!#marseyrofl:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I also looked about about the fricking petition laws and it seems that they had 15,000 petitions in 2023. But only 1/4 of them were fricking accepted.

15,000/4=3,750 people who need to be

:#marseywoodchipper2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Thats petitions, not petitioners :marseygigaretard: . It's just a massive amount of them. Probably r-slurred nonsense anyway, so better put them in my dungeon for a week :marseyselfflagellation:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyconfused:

I was fricking just suggesting way to lower the fricking amount of German :marseynegativeweiss: bureaucracy and maintaining population control :marseyshadow:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not until we got rid of the bong menace first. Everything else doesn't matter then :marseyindignant:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Thats overall Bundenstag petitions that were submitted r-slur

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyconfused:

I was fricking talking :marseypluribusanus: about Germans in general :marseysalutenovorossiya:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sorry king youre the germ pro. I knew this sounds like bull from the getgo but didnt have enough highgerm knowledge to refute it accurately

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You had me at feminists bad.

:marseydoubtit:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The more people that sign it the more people that are being fricked. Good job.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.