Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Most controversial "rightoid" movie of the last 5 years is a movie about stopping s*x trafficking of minors

>Most controversial "leftoid" movie of the last 5 years is Cuties

I feel like there may be a connection here !nooticers

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Darn it's like rightoids lost the culture war so hard they can't even make movies :s#coot:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

When is Mel gonna chud out for good

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm glad you put them in quotation marks because I was going to call you an r-slured cute twink. But you aite white boy, you aite.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

recently there was a ping talking cuties and I looked into some old drama

honestly it's insane how relatively little controversy there was about the movie and most mind boggling of all, that there were people who felt comfortable defending soft child porn to own the cons

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's not complex, theyre just evil and wanr to...

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

On the one hand, it's good to see movies that appeal to people of different political persuasions. On the other hand, America is politically polarised as it is and I'd rather not start going down the road of some studios producing 'liberal' movies and other studios producing 'conservative' movies.

It's not even a 'conservative' movie because for SOME WEIRD REASON one side of the political spectrum has an issue with the premise of being against child trafficking.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'd rather not start going down the road of some studios producing 'liberal' movies

too late for that shit

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's "conservative" because they want to cancel Caviezel for being a super-fervent christcuck. He said some crazy shit on TV once and that's worth downplaying child s*x trafficking I guess.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

zoz

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

zle

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

zozzle

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's less important than the fact that it's reception amongst 'the right' has given all these peepeesuckers some data points to add to COINTELPRO.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16891139501476364.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More like the Sound of Seethe! Am I right!? Ha! Got em' :marsey57:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Waiting to see this on prime.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Its a fricking action movie and these strags are acting like its some pro Qanon Trump Jan 6th movie. Fricking r-slurs.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This movie was pretty good and extremely upsetting. It's not Taken vibes, it's unironic-gasp-in-horror im-gonna-loose-my-lunch vibes.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I do not care about whether your intention was to be funny or not. If your "satire" is functionally indistinguishable from the thing you claim to be satirising, you suck shit at satire and should find a new hobby, nevermind what your political alleigances are or are not.

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.