Unable to load image

Under Siege (1992)

"Die Hard on a battleship." This one is not a classic but light years ahead of the quippy CGI heavy shit we get these days.

Some negatives:

  • Dumbest villain ever. The wicked CIA employs an unstable psychopath to do highly risky missions where they don't want to get caught. This is just too dumb to work even in an action. And washed up hippies are just not that intimidating.

  • Pretty dumb premise. The terrorists attack, of all things, a battleship with 1800 sailors onboard, and hope nothing unexpected will happen. Again, this just makes the villain seem r-slurred.

  • The chick has one of those terrible ultra short haircuts that were a plague in the early 1990s.

  • I'm pretty sure that you'd have some difficulty making a phone call while shooting automatic weapons inside the corridor of a battleship.

But it has its moments:

  • Steven Seagal actually doesn't suck. He's either not fat or they carefully shot around it. He looks like he knows how to use a knife. And dare I say, he can even do the bare minimum of acting necessary.

  • The hero's backstory is actually really clever to make him who he is and put him in the right place at the right time.

  • The setting is great for action. The exterior of a warship, especially a really big one, is a bizarre place because it's got multiple levels overlooking each other at steep angles. There's all kinds of ladders and stairs and hatches to get around. This movie takes advantage of that.

  • The technology is actually represented pretty accurately, both the old WW2 era stuff and the 1980s Reaganavy refit stuff.

  • It's the only fricking movie I've ever seen that acknowledges you can just blow up a nuclear weapon and it won't somehow cause a nuclear explosion. Virtually every movie involving nuclear weapons relies on the audience being dumb enough to think nukes are like gasoline. It takes a Steven Seagal movie to finally not insult my intelligence.

I visited USS Missouri on its farewell cruise that year and it was pretty awesome. But don't take my word for it.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1704852198638041.webp

Visit your local Iowa-class battleship museums at Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Honolulu, and Norfolk.

20
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Erika Eleniak had possibly the best movie tits of all time in this movie.

Also Tommy Lee Jones and Gary Busey delivered near oscar worthy performances as the villans

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

best movie tits of all time

Found the guy who's never seen Lifeforce.

I thought the villains were a little over the top and wacky compared to the rest of the movie.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Just compared. Lifeforce seems like big natural titties while Under Siege has some VERY high quality bolt-ons. It depends on if you're feeling like a hottie or a bimbo in the moment.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think we need to have a thread about best movie titties because there are a lot of contenders.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

/h/Glory is the perfect venue

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

In Lifeforce she walks around completely topless femdomming guys to death for like 5 minutes. It's truly the greatest achievement of 1980s trash cinema.

And somehow Patrick Stewart is in it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh that's wonderful. Probably had a long run on Skinemax and USA Up All Night.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nailed it. Nuclear weapon primary explosives use insensitive high explosives that can't be set off by bullets or fires, because those are realistic hazards in combat or on a runway. You can ruin the shape of the fissile material and crack the high explosives so that it won't work. Most likely you'll trigger a tamper device and kill the warhead.

You left out the best part of the show -- stripper in a cake and big butt titties.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

But do titties mean anything without hair? :marseythinkorino:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You forgot the best scene...

That's how computers worked in the early ninties, zoomers.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://media.giphy.com/media/yUlFNRDWVfxCM/giphy.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

thats under siege 2

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ah, who cares?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's Under Siege 2 of course. You would know if you'd seen it in the theater. :marseyboomer:

I think this one is underrated but I haven't seen it in a long time.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

A gigabyte of ram should do it

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I always liked hard to kill as well. He gets alot of crap, but he has some solid flicks.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I love killer chefs :marseychef:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The last person I want to get in a fight with is a middle aged asian lady who knows how to use a cleaver.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://media1.tenor.com/m/GLTV_iy4Lc4AAAAd/mad-cleaver.gif

i know how to use a cleaver too hehe

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wtf kind of weird asian fruit is that?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Choppring Boardru

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Kung Fu Hustle!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17025988883967621.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I saw the USS Texas in Galveston

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's gotta be awesome. Is it the oldest surviving dreadnought?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

My expert historical analysis:

Dunno but it's old lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.