A dark "comedy" (to use the term very loosely) about a band of plucky educated white liberals trying to save the world from an incoming comet and more importantly all the dumb rednecks surrounding them in America. I use "comedy" in quotation marks because there's a few jokes in it but really not any more than you'd have in a decent drama. What you're really in for is an emotional experience designed to reassure the intended audience that their beliefs are true and they're on the right side.
Hollywood has perhaps never gone this far up its own butt. our heroes come from the same background as everyone in Hollywood and share the same social norms and political beliefs. The villains are a female version of Trump and Elon Musk. While the movie is extremely heavy handed in making sure you know who they are, both characters are totally neutered, lacking the buffoonery that makes their real life counterparts repulsive to some and compelling to others. It turns out that when Trump is wrong about everything but doesn't act like a clown he's actually really boring. Musk's portrayal is even more bland as the last thing the writers could ever do is shame him for drug addiction and weird s*x stuff. The first duty of a Hollywood writer is to let people enjoy things, even at the expense of totally gutting their own movie. After all, they've already had our heroine smoke weed in the beginning in order to show us that she's one of the good guys.
The movie is incredibly dated to the point where it would be incomprehensible to anyone who didn't live through the few years between Trump's election and Covid breaking out. The main message against climate change deniers was already by then as this was not a major political issue in the Trump era. But it's an issue where the right wing was wrong and stupid in the past so the left will keep trying to refight that battle over and over again. But the pandemic casts an interesting light on our heroes' preachiness. Their basic message is that we should always listen to the experts and academia. I believe one of them when being interviewed on TV literally screams "Trust the science!" Having lived through a global catastrophe where we followed the strategy of "just listen to the science man on TV" we know where that leads. It ended up in chaos as the scientists were pressed to make decisions in fields they were completely unqualified in. As our scientific understanding of Covid changed they tried to keep up and change their instructions but this just led to confusion. It turns out that putting scientists in charge of everything makes about as much sense as Ayatollah Khomeini putting clerics in charge of everything. Hollywood isn't really interested in science except as a cudgel to beat its opponents with, the same way evangelical Christians use the bible.
Ultimately the villain isn't Trump or Musk or the comet. It's America. Every attempt to save the world is stymied by the American people, whether they're ignorant yokels following Trump, greedy working class people who hope Musk's plan offers them a better future, or just Americans in general. Just in case you think they're trying to make a point about human nature, they shoehorn in a couple unnecessary scenes to have China, Russia, and India band together to save the world (fricking LOL), only to be treacherously sabotaged by the Americans. These are not people who hate Trump because he's bad for democracy. These are people who hate Trump because they'd rather have Putin, Xi, and Modi running the world.
In the end our heroes pick up an evangelical Christian to join them, apparently to prove how open minded they are. But this really only shows just how narrow the range of people accepted by their culture is. You can be their token Christian but only if you give up all the parts of yourself that really matter. The "Christian" joins them because of his sexual interest in our quirky heroine, apparently really turned on by her awful haircut and nose ring. He never challenges anyone's beliefs and is really no different from them in any meaningful way. It's not a coincidence that this eunichized version of a Christian is played by Timothee Chalamet, the most effeminate twink in Hollywood. He's described in the script as a "evangelical shoplifting skater punk" and his hair was designed to make him look like a gay hillbilly. Jesus might accept you for who you are, but J-Law won't unless you look like a fairy.
Isn't he so cute and non-threatening?
The movie ends with our heroes sitting around the table for a family dinner as the world is destroyed. Given the content of the entire movie up until this point, it feels like a mockery of the American family. As the Satanic black mass ridicules the Catholic mass, this anti-American family dinner mirrors the forms of a real one. In the end Leonardo "R-sluro" DiCaprio observes that before the ignorant unwashed masses of America ruined everything, "We really did have everything, didn't we?" If you can say yes to that because you're a soulless upper middle class white who has never faced any hardships or aspired to do more than fit in with your peers then this is a movie for you. I wonder how many fans of this movie would actually be able to sit down with their own family and eat dinner.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I hate Adam Mckay so much is unreal
You're the first to point that scene, it was so cringy. SEEE AMERICA DOESN'T DO ANYTHING AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE WHILE THE REST OF THE WORLD IS TRYING TO SAVE US! Bernie Sander's speechwriter David Sirota wrote the script btw and there's a scene with wholesome Bernie on a newsreel criticizing President Meryl Trump. Just shows what a bunch of fifth-columnists the writers are !anticommunists
The biggest issue with the plot is the climate change analogy.
NO, just NO
Incremental climate change over a century is not the same as being hit by an extinction level event in a couple of years and libs should stop making false equivalencies and start proposing realistic solutions to tackle the future climate crisis. And is not that climate change isn't serious but fearmongering about the world ending in 2040 is just lying and wont solve anything. Neither will exaggerate the problem to incite “action”, policymakers and the public DO need accurate data, projections and timelines, you need those to prepare as a country and society.
!ifrickinglovescience
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Death ☠️ to America
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And buttersauce!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Climate change is important but not urgent. Taking a few years to study the problem and figure out the right solution will cost us very little. But we've got all these tards who still imagine that we have to convince all the deniers that it's real and stop using cars RIGHT NOW. (Of course these people use cars just as much as everyone else. Curious. )
I once talked to a guy who worked at the Oregon Department of Energy. The Democrats were pushing some tax on fuel for semi trucks or something and justified it by saying it was about climate change. I said that this is kind of a global problem that we can't solve at the state level. His eyes went wild like any other kind of religious fanatic and he insisted that we absolutely must have this tax right now. He told me that by the 2020s there would be tens of thousands of people in Oregon dead because of climate change. And then I was just like...
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Local strategies are good especially in developed countries where GHG emissions are high. Oregon is reliant on hydropower isn't it? That makes it cleaner than most states, at the end total emissions is what matters, the US and China together account for half of global emissions.
One thing that concerns me is crop failure and food insecurity due to extreme weather events, so I think mitigation strategies are also important. Heat or drought resistant crops, more GMO research to increase yields, more research on vertical farming and feasibility.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, we blew up our dams because the Native Americans wanted to fish
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I hate this shit. It's probably 14 people total from that "tribe." And lol @ "restoring ceremony and language." I can't believe those heckin mean dams were stopping them from talking and driving around to visit each other.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Holy shit, that's incredibly r-slurred. I can't imagine anyone here proposing getting rid of Itaipu because of fisheries lmao.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Yeah, I'm not against all local strategies. This one I was highly skeptical of because we've had so many green energy scandals in Oregon where someone with political connections just grabbed a bunch of money and walked away with it.
In the 20th century we had cheap power from the dams on the Columbia River. Today it's not enough so we burn some gas from Alaska and when demand is really high coal too. We used to have a nuclear plant but it was defective and had to be torn down.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's sad. What about Solar? Or you guys don't get enough sunshine hours per year to make it worth?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
West of the mountains where almost everyone lives it's raining or cloudy most of the year. But to the east it's desert. I know they've got windmills out there. Not sure if there's any solar.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I disagree. People work better with deadlines, so inventing one is better, politically, than telling people that some stuff should be maybe be changed in some way at some point
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I think providing realistic and crude assessments of the situation along with deadlines is more than necessary, but purposefully exaggerating is counterproductive. The problem with doing that is that it will fuel climate skepticism along distrust for academia once doomsday predictions fail to happen. It also fuels apathy as if the world is ending then why even bother?
I'm referring specifically to a certain breed of climate doomers with terrible takes like “runaway greenhouses will turn us into Venus!” Which is just false. Or presenting the absolute worst-case scenarios as if they're 100% going to happen no matter what.
At the end is a very complicated matter. Billions of people are alive today because of fossil fuels and transition to cleaner sources is hard, albeit necessary to avoid worst-case scenarios. The duty of scientists is to present data and provide advice but at the end policymaking of that scale requires societal discussion.
Just to clear up I still think “climate skepticism” is MUCH worse than alarmism, but I'm pointing out some alarmist flaws.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Idk I found it mildly funny.
Don't confuse it with me saying I found it profound or good, but I watched it with my dad and we both had fun.
I don't think the movie is good, but I feel like a lot of people took it personal for some reason sneeding about how they made fun of their side or something, which just isn't a good criticism
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I watched it with parents too and my dad thought it was boring.
I share his opinion, for me it wasn't just the ham-fisted message, I didn't thought the humor was good.
A good humorous show with thinly veiled leftist criticism is The White Lotus, that's satire done right.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I don't like movies that hit you in the face with the writers' r-slurred West Cost politics. That and the jokes didn't land because movie writers are terrible comics.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
@Bussy-boy didn't find it funny or good. @Bussy-boy was more annoyed @Bussy-boy had too hear a voiceover about fricking climate change and how Trump is bad for making fun of climate change deniers.
black lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Its so weird too because Musk is the guy who makes EVs, and like theres tons of shit that will never change about the world because it keeps Hollywood guys in power. Theyre more likely to call for the end of cars than the end of jet planes that let them fly from coast to coast
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Fricking LOL indeed. Whoever wrote this shit, and the person who greenlit this scene, should be flogged.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The script was by David Sirota
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Sirota
Literal Bernie speechwriter and Jacobin journo
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So a filthy commie. We are fortunate that these people don't even hide who the are.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Climate change activism is ruined by climate change activists
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Also @Redactor0, don't forget about the scene where Jennifer Lawrence goes to her parent's house to spend the end of the world with them. We see a regular suburbia and there's an American flag flying by the house. Then her parents tell her to go away because “we don't want any politics” and that “the comet will bring jobs”.
It was the epitome of “EVERYTHING IS POLITICAL” and “CUT TIES WITH YOUR TOXIC FAMILY” progs preach online
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The movie would have been good if it had nuance and made fun of self destructive environmentalists who only hurt their own cause.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Thanks Armond White
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
For ages I've heard nonstop jokes in media, on the internet, and from others that make it seem like having a small peepee is somehow a death sentence or makes for some unbearable existence. I disagree. I have what I'd take to be a rather small member, probably no more than 4 inches when erect, and when flaccid, I get that epic Greek statue look.
Snapshots:
designed to make him look like a gay hillbilly:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context