No what I defined were competing ideologies that claim to be the ultimate truth. All those I listed above claim there is one objective truth. One objective morality.
The disagreement lies in whose is correct.
Moral relativism believes there is no object morality and that all of the above are neither right or wrong because it is relative to their culture, religion, nation, etc.
Fair point, in any case when someone brings up that a magic man in the sky said killing and suffering is actually a good thing, I lose any ability to convince them of anything different
In order to convince someone, you have to make an argument in the first place.
All you've done so far is make a wild claim that no one really believes to attempt to counter moral objectivity and then preceded to insult my religion with huge straw man.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You've never lived outside a city have you?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Retreat to moral relativism, how ironic
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's not relativism that's you having a lack of experience and understanding of wildlife.
There is an objective morality it's just not defined by your or even my inexperienced views of the world
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Can you name a single property of your objective morality that I can't use to make you look like a moron based on this comment chain
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
My belief is that morality is defined by the Bible.
Were I Muslim it would be defined by the quaran
If I were Jewish it would be defined by mosaic law
Etc. etc.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You just described moral relativism bro
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No what I defined were competing ideologies that claim to be the ultimate truth. All those I listed above claim there is one objective truth. One objective morality.
The disagreement lies in whose is correct.
Moral relativism believes there is no object morality and that all of the above are neither right or wrong because it is relative to their culture, religion, nation, etc.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Fair point, in any case when someone brings up that a magic man in the sky said killing and suffering is actually a good thing, I lose any ability to convince them of anything different
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
In order to convince someone, you have to make an argument in the first place.
All you've done so far is make a wild claim that no one really believes to attempt to counter moral objectivity and then preceded to insult my religion with huge straw man.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context