Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Kino. I don't understand why didnt they make Battle of Shiloh, Battle of Chickamauga and Battle of Antietam using same formula.

All of those battles would work for everyone. You can clown on Union for their frick ups. Incluging clowing Grant and sherman. But at end you have Union victory. Except Chickamauga, but that had heroic stand by union.

Shiloh you could make Albert Sidney Johnston look great. Until he dies and thats why battle turned bad for south. You could show grant and sherman fricking up big time. But grant scramples and keep it toghetor and pull it to through and wins.

Antietam you have south fricking up. But union is full of clowns who cant pour piss out of their boots with instruction writen on heel. Heroci last second save by stonewall. But eventually union wins.

Chickamauga union walks in trap. Rosecrans loses his cool. Thomas (southerner himself) makes heroci stand. Garfields ride to thomas.

South wins. But union makes heroci stand and south cant capitalise victory.

That way you would make lost cause and souther audience happy and make northerners and anti lost causes people happy. So long you dont go crazy with people ranting about slavery and such.

And best part. Once you have wagons, tents, gear, uniforms. Muskets and cannons. You have all the props you need to make all three movies. It would be like lord of ring. Where first movie was used to make all the props. Making next two movies cheeper and allowing you to have bigger set piece battles

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

K

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I am almost always correct. And though I can come off as arrogant - I do it with finesse and style. You, though, appear kinda wet behind the ears, are pretty much an empty suit, and are scarcely fit to address me as you are so clearly my inferior. If we ever have a real debate about anything of substance (which seems unlikely as you are heavily on the trolling and shit stirring side of things) you will lose and lose badly. And I'll do it with half my brain tied behind my back. Yes, I'm that good. But more than that - I've never seen anything out of you that substantiates your inflated opinion of yourself. I'd like to buy you for what you are worth and sell you for what you think you are worth. But alas, that seems about as likely as any kind of worthwhile discussion. Because unless you stick around here a lot I'm soon going to go back to being uninterested in you.

Snapshots:

:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.