Your thoughts dramatards?

Did you find this in /r/KotakuinAction?

That place is like the YT-moid version of /r/Blackladies or /r/AsianMasculinty, given the levels of impotent rage and self-pity.

As long as you avoid culture war shit causing

A long time ago, I'm about to watch Dirty Harry. I'm really pumped because Roger Ebert said it was the most fascist movie he'd ever seen! Maybe it'll be like Death Wish 3!

And then... it turns out Dirty Harry just thinks the soft on crime stuff from the early 1970s went way too far. Like everyone who was alive back then. I was terribly disappointed and never trusted critics again. Definitely not him. As on Newsradio:

And then you would say "If I wanted to talk about movies I'd get that guy Siskel Ebert here." And I would say "Sir, those are two different people." And you would say "Just because the man is overweight doesn't mean you have to make fun of him."

My rule of thumb is that if a film is anything below 50% from audience is almost guaranteed to be unwatchable and 50-60% audience is dangerously close to that. However 80%-90% of audience is not a guarantee of a good movie.

As for critics typically 80-100% is almost guaranteed being good (unless Marvel slop or pretentious artsy film), but there are good films with a 50 something % score as long as they have an 80%+ of the audience.

Also, most films in the 60-79% range are in the "forgettable/mediocre" territory.

91 critic and 96 audience score is gauranteed marvel slop

Also i dont trust movies with too high of an audience score because most movie goers are r-slurs

Potential !kino recommendations from terminallly online neurodivergents is the best way to find movies: a thread.

All movies made after 2016 are garbage

I hate the whole idea of film critics. That isn't a real job, first of all, . Who decided to care what "critics" think? Just pirate the movie and decide for yourself

Middle tier is the best

If the score is like 85% or greater for either the audience or critics while the other score is like >40% higher or lower difference then the rating is 100% due to culture war reasons. A high critic and low audience is a soy movie and a high audience and low critic is a rightoid movie.

I think it's r-slurred to let other people sway your opinion on things. Just fricking watch the movie, who cares about the ratings

One of my uncle is movie critic for chain of cinemas and he decide what movies to buy.

In other words I don't really trust critics.

Anything described as comfy is crap

The worst wanky films I've seen recently all had critics scores in the 90s and audience numbers between 65-75%, so the middle one doesn't have enough grade inflation. But then, I really like most of the A24 movies I've seen. Most recently because Maxxxine is coming out, I watched 'X' and 'Pearl', neither of which you could really call pretentious.

I agree except the boondock saints tier should also be under great

#3 should be "Right wing message or producer."

When it's something like 30%/80%, critics to audience, you know it's a good movie

I just saw Hit Man which scored over 90 for both. It was just ok. Not great. I expected something either hilarious or more interesting based on the score.