IRREDEEMABLE-KRAMPUSCHAD/STUD
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for Israeli children.
2mo ago(image post)448 thread views#300479spent 295 currency on pings
Redactor0naori/oppa
Darklands shill, do not engage
2mo ago#7024420
spent 0 currency on pings
[Disclaimer: I know the movie and certain parts of the book, which did not impress me, so my recollections will mix the two up.]
This might be petty but I go absolutely apeshit at the ending of that movie where the whole gimmick for the ending is somebody has a starlight scope. In a basement. You dumb motherlover. Do you understand the "starlight" part of it? It's light amplification. It just makes everything way brighter. If you're in a basement there is no light source so there's nothing to amplify. Why would you make the whole gimmick for the ending of your book/movie be all about this technology except it totally does not work at all like that?
I'm not particularly in love with Tom Clancy but I find it fascinating that your New York crowd rated this book really highly but thought he wasn't classy.
But Redactor, it's not about the night vision goggles, it's about these characters and their interactions!
First of all, it's hard to take you seriously while you're soycrying.
Second, we could go into that if you really want me to. Silence of the Lambs is peak white women and f-slurs imagining what jail, serial killers, etc. would be like because it's all very distant from them.
Third: Don't introduce this as a key plot element to wrap up all the loose ends in your story and then whine that only nerds care about how it works. You brought the night vision goggles into the story. You made a very deliberate choice here. If this seems like obscure pedantry, hey, I was born because a starlight scope caught a really good NVA sapper creeping up on my dad. But for the people writing (r-slurred male perverts) and reading (r-slurred female perverts) "mystery" novels, they couldn't give a shit.
This is why even though Anne Rice is always writing homoerotic stuff about gay Babylonians it's superior to that kind of slop. I don't have to stop every 30 seconds and say "that's not how ancient people were!" When I'm reading the modern serial killer fiction I do stop every 30 seconds and say "that's not even how modern people are".
The fricking technology for infrared goes back a fricking long way.
The fricking reason the fricking Starlight scope was fricking innovative in vietnam was fricking because it didn't need IR light, which could give away position to enemy.
The fricking reason the fricking Starlight scope was fricking innovative in vietnam was fricking because it didn't need IR light, which could give away position to enemy.
Yes but that's a totally different kind of technology.
They had IR scopes at the end of WW2, used to some effect, but they were extremely heavy and bulky. It was a niche thing.
Not sure what you're trying to argue with me about.
Did they say it was fricking specifically an old one from vietnam or something, b-word? didn't read your original comment since i have adhd, dyslexia, and fribomyalgae
The movie was made in like 1990 or something. They didn't have imaging IR back then. And it was based on a movie from a lot older. So yes, it was all about Vietnam tech.
Thanks for your concern. I'm glad some zoomer who thinks the entire 20th Centure Century was one moment came here. It's very valuable.
But you wouldn't make the ending of your movie be all about that. Not unless it was something really stupid like Invasion USA where Chuck Norris shoots the guy with a LAW rocket and there's a huge explosion even though these things barely weigh more than a hot pocket.
The ending of Silence of the Lambs is the bit where Lecter escapes. If the film was made nowadays they would have engineered for Clarice Starling to be there and have corny scene where Lecter spares her but this movie had the taste to stick to the book for that part.
Wrapping up the Buffalo Bill plot is an afterthought and I'm fine with it being based on a fictional piece of technology as are the majority of people.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
[Disclaimer: I know the movie and certain parts of the book, which did not impress me, so my recollections will mix the two up.]
This might be petty but I go absolutely apeshit at the ending of that movie where the whole gimmick for the ending is somebody has a starlight scope. In a basement. You dumb motherlover. Do you understand the "starlight" part of it? It's light amplification. It just makes everything way brighter. If you're in a basement there is no light source so there's nothing to amplify. Why would you make the whole gimmick for the ending of your book/movie be all about this technology except it totally does not work at all like that?
I'm not particularly in love with Tom Clancy but I find it fascinating that your New York crowd rated this book really highly but thought he wasn't classy.
First of all, it's hard to take you seriously while you're soycrying.
Second, we could go into that if you really want me to. Silence of the Lambs is peak white women and f-slurs imagining what jail, serial killers, etc. would be like because it's all very distant from them.
Third: Don't introduce this as a key plot element to wrap up all the loose ends in your story and then whine that only nerds care about how it works. You brought the night vision goggles into the story. You made a very deliberate choice here. If this seems like obscure pedantry, hey, I was born because a starlight scope caught a really good NVA sapper creeping up on my dad. But for the people writing (r-slurred male perverts) and reading (r-slurred female perverts) "mystery" novels, they couldn't give a shit.
This is why even though Anne Rice is always writing homoerotic stuff about gay Babylonians it's superior to that kind of slop. I don't have to stop every 30 seconds and say "that's not how ancient people were!" When I'm reading the modern serial killer fiction I do stop every 30 seconds and say "that's not even how modern people are".
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Some Starlight Scopes have an IR light so its possible to see without any external light.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's a whole other thing tho. That did not exist in 1980.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The fricking technology for infrared goes back a fricking long way.
The fricking reason the fricking Starlight scope was fricking innovative in vietnam was fricking because it didn't need IR light, which could give away position to enemy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes but that's a totally different kind of technology.
They had IR scopes at the end of WW2, used to some effect, but they were extremely heavy and bulky. It was a niche thing.
Not sure what you're trying to argue with me about.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
The fricking ones used in vietname were fricking passive only, but most modern ones come with an IR light.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes. Exactly my point.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Did they say it was fricking specifically an old one from vietnam or something, b-word? didn't read your original comment since i have adhd, dyslexia, and fribomyalgae
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The movie was made in like 1990 or something. They didn't have imaging IR back then. And it was based on a movie from a lot older. So yes, it was all about Vietnam tech.
Thanks for your concern. I'm glad some zoomer who thinks the entire 20th Centure Century was one moment came here. It's very valuable.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Fam, have you seen what firearm suppressors can do in movies and vidya?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
But you wouldn't make the ending of your movie be all about that. Not unless it was something really stupid like Invasion USA where Chuck Norris shoots the guy with a LAW rocket and there's a huge explosion even though these things barely weigh more than a hot pocket.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The ending of Silence of the Lambs is the bit where Lecter escapes. If the film was made nowadays they would have engineered for Clarice Starling to be there and have corny scene where Lecter spares her but this movie had the taste to stick to the book for that part.
Wrapping up the Buffalo Bill plot is an afterthought and I'm fine with it being based on a fictional piece of technology as are the majority of people.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context