Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>You'd have to stop the fentanyl to do that. This all started with the Sackler family's evil work with oxycodone, and morphed to the fentanyl epidemic due to easy access.

>It's astounding how they were able to get away with this.

Are the Sacklers sending armed soldiers to pin people down and force the fentanyl into their bodies? This kind of logic is like saying "I had no choice but to cheat on my wife, I was alone with a really hot woman who was wearing a miniskirt, I couldn't help myself".

Yes, if society didn't suck as much people would probably do less alcohol and drugs, but at some point you have to develop an internal locus of control. And I say this as someone who drinks too much booze for his own good.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I believe it started with a lot of patients being prescribed it and being told that it wasn't addictive, when it was very addictive.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The Sacklers deserve to be dragged through the streets for lying about the research results but most people that get hooked on fent are not former surgery patients who were given way too much oxy.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.