piece of fiction?
Helmer: You are talking like a child. You understand nothing about the society you live in.
Nora: No I don't... I must try to discover who is right, society or me.
Off the top of my head, there's Ted's favorite book, Conrad's The Secret Agent (which gets my vote, because he makes fun of Twitter anarchists for larping). There's all the angsty shit Dostoevsky wrote. There's Roth's American Pastoral, which, if anything, is anti-
. Then of course there's blue-pilled 1880s Norwegian feminism, or old-timey female Joker lit: Ibsen.
But what really is the angstiest piece of literature for edgy anarchists to read that's not shit? 1984 doesn't count, because Orwell was a boring socialist and it's peachy and redditty, unlike Brave New World. What Is to Be Done? doesn't count, because Nabokov and I say it's dreadful.
What would the gigabrained Joker actually carry under his arm as he assassinates John Lennon?
Don't forget to turn off signatures in settings!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
CS Lewis goes MASK OFF at coomers in Mere Christianity
"For me the real evil of masturbation would be that it takes an appetite which, in lawful use, leads the individual out of himself to complete (and correct) his own personality in that of another (and finally in children and even grandchildren) and turns it back: sends the man back into the prison of himself, there to keep a harem of imaginary brides. And this harem, once admitted, works against his ever getting out and really uniting with a real woman. For the harem is always accessible, always subservient, calls for no sacrifices or adjustments, and can be endowed with erotic and psychological attractions which no real woman can rival. Among those shadowy brides he is always adored, always the perfect lover: no demand is made on his unselfishness, no mortification ever imposed on his vanity. In the end, they become merely the medium through which he increasingly adores himself . . . . And it is not only the faculty of love which is thus sterilized, forced back on itself, but also the faculty of imagination.
The true exercise of imagination, in my view, is (a) To help us to understand other people (b) To respond to, and, some of us, to produce, art. But it has also a bad use: to provide for us, in shadowy form, a substitute for virtues, successes, distinctions etc. which ought to be sought outside in the real world—e.g. picturing all I’d do if I were rich instead of earning and saving. Masturbation involves this abuse of imagination in erotic matters (which I think bad in itself) and thereby encourages a similar abuse of it in all spheres. After all, almost the main work of life is to come out of our selves, out of the little, dark prison we are all born in. Masturbation is to be avoided as all things are to be avoided which r-slur this process. The danger is that of coming to love the prison.”
RETVRN
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Lewis didn't know that all men are born coomers, did he?
It's ineluctable, and rather than becoming a powermod to /r/nofap, you've gotta just have the most kino mindharem imaginable, to impress your coomer homies.
Don't forget to turn off signatures in settings!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context