Unable to load image

:marseylongpost: CPTSD /r/writing foid: Men constantly become violent/aggressive in my stories...how do I change that? :punchjak::gigachad2:

https://old.reddit.com/r/writing/comments/14ituj6/men_constantly_become_violentaggressive_in_my

This sounds dumb, but is true: As a kid, I grew up with a lot of violence. Men, in my family, school, but also on the street, were either utterly angry or utterly indifferent at all time. [...] :punchjak:

Due to this, I didn't really socialize with guys till I was an adult. And while I do know some "opposite examples" now, this shit is still bleeding in my writing. Like, I've been writing a script with around 5 main male characters. In general I treated them like every other character: Character, motivations etc. However, now a Beta-Reader informed me that they all sound needlessly aggressive. Like: Rude, cold and/or indifferent. :gigachad2: Very strong in contrast to the female characters, who are very "normal", including empathy, kindness and "often sounding like the last wall between a full out massacre sometimes".

Now, obviously I don't want that. I live for four-dimensional characters. But looking through my other stories, I can def see a pattern: Men (if not the LI) are often villains. There are grumpy old men, shitty fathers, sociopathic Mafia bosses etc. "Positive" examples, are mostly just variations of 1.) My cousin (very nice, extroverted guy) and 2.) character-types I picked from other stories (e.g. "old man who is too invested in his grandson's love life")

Any advice? Cause at this rate, I'll paint a very, very bad picture and I hate it

"How can I make myself not hate men? I know! I'll talk to some Redditors!" :marseyfoidretard:

>Writing wish fulfillment romance scenarios while hating the opposite s*x

:chudsey: 🀝 :!marseywomanmoment:


The thing that comes to my mind is to consume more stories with male characters that display the traits that you're looking to emulate in your own writing. [...] I can offer some movie recs: Before I Disappear (2014), Submarine (2010), and Stand By Me (1986) all explore I would say a more tender side of masculinity

Ever notice how their go to examples are never books? :marseynoooticer:

OP:

Good point. I did get a lot of LI material from romance books. So maybe I can do the same that way. I'll the check out the suggestions! :marseywomanmoment:

No, don't do that. I love a good bodice ripper, they're my guilty pleasure, but you are not going to get an example of loving, normal men from them. They are always portrayed as a slightly aggressive "Alpha Male" type who gets extremely possessive of his love interest and has problems expressing feelings :marseyradfem:

:soysnoo: You will NOT have a man who protects you. You WILL comfort your boyfriend when he comes home crying after work.

:marseysoylentgrin: I have to offer a word of caution, here. Romance books give people a distorted ideas of a relationship the same way porn gives people distorted ideas of s*x. They're idealized or sensationalized because it's better for the person consuming the product, not because it's realistic or healthy.

Women be reading romance. That's basically the same as me edging in my goon cave for four hours every night.


If you wanted to, you could write the men as "normal" people, too. As people first, men second. :marseyindignant:

Novice writers when you explain to them that the opposite s*x are people

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16878107029363565.webp

I try. That's the problem. I try, but in the end, there's something that just bleeds through. However, tbf, maybe this does speak of a deeper issue. Like, maybe I know logically that men are people (duh), but emotionally, there's still a part who does not believe it...? Idk.

Trust your instincts, sister :marseynails:


:marseyfreud: Some therapy wouldn't hurt. It's reflective of your experience, and not dealing with your past to a healthy degree is warping your ability to see men as anything other than what you experienced.

I am on the hunt for that, don't worry. I've had some therapy for 5 years, but I was just newly diagnosed with CPTSD last year. So rn I'm in this "in-between" of switching therapies.

Five years of therapy didn't work? Better give it another five years. :marseyclueless:


:marseysoylentgrin: For the sake of providing advice I don't see here, you could try writing a character as a girl then just changing them to be a guy. It's unconventional, but it might help you eliminate your bias. Alternatively, make really mousey nerdy overly polite type guys who avoid aggression. We exist, lol.

:marseydisgust: Is this... the ick?


I'm not crazy, i promise, but you're going to think I am. If you're willing to go out on a limb, though, i think it'll help.

Now, people have said therapy and that's not a bad idea. It does sound like the unresolved trauma is causing problems, but we're not doctors so that's about as far as we can suggest with that.

What you should do is, like someone else suggested, find and consume media with more positive male figures.

:marseywut2: Watch Bluey. I'm not kidding. It's about a little girl who is a dog and her dog family and Bandit is a good girl-dad. He's portrayed as a normal dad, in that he gets frustrated but he tries not to lose his cool.

I'm not kidding. It'll help.

:marseytrollcrazy: I AM NOT CRAZY!


Without actually reading her work I can't evaluate it or try to psychoanalyze her.

What I can tell you is that Redditors are the last people you should ask about masculinity. Redditors are hardcore feminists to the exact extent that they believe feminism strips them of masculine responsibility. Once we get rid of toxic masculinity, women will finally throw themselves at timid scrawny nerds who cry once a week... Right? :marseyclueless:

It seems to me like the obvious advice is to portray male aggression honestly, while showing the neutral or positive ways it can be channeled. The Redditors instead are telling her to feminize her male characters, watch children's cartoons, and get (another five years of) therapy, sweaty.

139
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Honestly I give her credit for at least admitting she's a shitty writer when it comes to men and trying to learn to do better. "Woman, yet can actually admit to being wrong" is a feature I wish they put on every model.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Foids or moids, you'll find humans with the ability to self-reflect quite rare sadly :marseybeanpensive:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseydepressed:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Stephen king got boring after he came off cocaine

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He's always had a lot of duds, I really don't know how he got as famous as he did. I feel like there's so many other low-brow authors out there with more consistency, even with Lee Child and Dan Brown there's some standards and consistency.

With Stephan King you can literally pinpoint the moment he gets bored of a story/runs out of coke and just lets it kind of end.

That said, Needful Things is based as shit and underrated.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

With Stephan King you can literally pinpoint the moment he gets bored of a story/runs out of coke and just lets it kind of end.

In Tommyknockers you can pinpoint the exact word (in chapter 3 IIRC) but I think he binged again later, because he wrote about Coca-Cola machines chasing and smashing journ*lists to death.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

because he wrote about Coca-Cola machines chasing and smashing journ*lists to death.

You can just say "based Coke machines;" you don't need to get all verbose on us

:marseybased::marseypepsi:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is why you are not a writer

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I actually have published a book already

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's nice sweetheart, now make a few sales.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseycry::#marseycrying::#marseysob:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Fake news.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Kang is really the only horror author popular with general audiences as far as I know, while he wouldn't be most horror fans' top pick. So I'd say his talents are connecting with people who don't usually read horror, and being prolific enough that when he makes a stinker he can come out with another two books in the next year.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think there’s relatively little competition when it comes to quality novel-length horror. Most horror writers are best at writing short stories or novellas, and King is definitely outclassed there, but he’s probably in the top 1% when it comes to full-length horror novels and unless you’re a weird fiction enthusiast that’s probably what you read.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I wish his movies would get redone with modern special effects and lighting.

But not like, have chloΓ« grace fricking moretz play what's supposed to be a homely donkey of a girl

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Koontz is in the same ballpark

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I've read a good number of his books, still do, and the books are always about 40% longer than they need to be. He doesn't know how to write endings, either.

At least he's aware of that flaw but it really gets old when you have 300 pages of fluff before "uhhh and then they

squished (GET OUT GET OUT GET OUT)

  the (MY LIFE MY LIFE DON'T DO IT)  

heart"

The end

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Seriously. I read this as, "How can I make my writing more bland and forgettable?"

The problem with a lot of shitty writers is they spend too much time trying to sound clever and not enough time telling the truth

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseynotes:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

And yet rDrama failed to read Manhunt by Gretchen Felker-Martin :marseyindignant:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

After I came on page 16 I kind of lost interest

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.