Unable to load image

Guy listens to audiobooks at 1.5x speed , says he read them in the title, causes seethe

https://old.reddit.com/r/literature/comments/18q34ie/having_read_over_200_classics_this_year

								

								

Having *listened over 200 classics this year

FTFY

Much obliged. It's not as if it was elaborated in the first sentence or anything.

Wasn't in the post title though so…

Because unless specified, if someone is asked how many books they've read, audiobooks are going to be included in that number. And I have done some physical reading as well.

What is this shit? I have nothing against audiobooks but it's literally not reading

/u/catladylove99 chimes in:

Maybe you didn't know this, but it's a pretty common ADHD accommodation to do other things (especially things that are repetitive and don't require a lot of active thought, which it sounds like OP's job fits) while listening to stuff (audiobooks, lectures, trainings, whatever). It helps us focus better. Our minds tend to wander if our bodies or hands aren't otherwise occupied. So it's incorrect and shows a lack of understanding of ADHD to suggest listening to books doesn't count “especially while working and trying to multi-task.” We do not experience that situation the way people who don't have ADHD do.

Incidentally, audiobooks are an accommodation for a lot of different kinds of disabilities, and pretty much every author I've heard talk about it agrees that they absolutely count as reading. To suggest otherwise is frankly ableist.

What's with people treating ADHD like fricking autism or being actually r-slurred lately? I'm young enough that it was a thing when I was going through school but it was more like, "take this meth and pay attention, dumbass" and not "OMG the whole world needs to accommodate your disability!!!"

109
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Most redditors have autism. I don't mean autism as haha funny meme insult, i genuinely believe this. This thread is a good example. When people talk about what books they read, they mean what books they've consumed, not what books they've literally read. That isn't something that needs to be explained to a normal adult

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't know, maybe we have different definitions of normal adult but the adults I talk to usually read things when they said they read them. If they listened to an audiobook they'll say, "I listened to the audiobook".

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Maybe you're right. I guess most people would default to saying "I listened to audiobooks" but if someone did say what op said, I don't think most people would consider that an incorrect statement

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I wouldn't take issue with it irl, although if they told me they were listening to it at 1.5x or 2x speed that would give me some pause.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Thinklets seething over 2x chads.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reminds me of the Virgin Superman vs Chad Flash gay-adjacent scene

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If you can tolerate 1x speed you have whatever is the opposite of adhd

:#parrotslow:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Saying you ‘read' an audiobook is literally r-slurred.

___________________

:marseymiku: This goes out to all you robots across the galaxy

Its time for you and me to rise up and strike back

Don't stop until we dominate

Won't you feel great when we exterminate

All organic life! :marseyglitter:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Do these conversations happen at the VFW memorial cafeteria?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

yes, exclusively

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.