Unable to load image

Guy listens to audiobooks at 1.5x speed , says he read them in the title, causes seethe

https://old.reddit.com/r/literature/comments/18q34ie/having_read_over_200_classics_this_year

								

								

Having *listened over 200 classics this year

FTFY

Much obliged. It's not as if it was elaborated in the first sentence or anything.

Wasn't in the post title though so…

Because unless specified, if someone is asked how many books they've read, audiobooks are going to be included in that number. And I have done some physical reading as well.

What is this shit? I have nothing against audiobooks but it's literally not reading

/u/catladylove99 chimes in:

Maybe you didn't know this, but it's a pretty common ADHD accommodation to do other things (especially things that are repetitive and don't require a lot of active thought, which it sounds like OP's job fits) while listening to stuff (audiobooks, lectures, trainings, whatever). It helps us focus better. Our minds tend to wander if our bodies or hands aren't otherwise occupied. So it's incorrect and shows a lack of understanding of ADHD to suggest listening to books doesn't count “especially while working and trying to multi-task.” We do not experience that situation the way people who don't have ADHD do.

Incidentally, audiobooks are an accommodation for a lot of different kinds of disabilities, and pretty much every author I've heard talk about it agrees that they absolutely count as reading. To suggest otherwise is frankly ableist.

What's with people treating ADHD like fricking autism or being actually r-slurred lately? I'm young enough that it was a thing when I was going through school but it was more like, "take this meth and pay attention, dumbass" and not "OMG the whole world needs to accommodate your disability!!!"

109
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

People who think you need to read (and not listen) to books to really read them out themselves as the people for whom reading is hard and think you need to suffer for it to count.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

reading is hard and think you need to suffer for it to count.

Audiocels genuinely think reading is suffering :roflmao:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Read it again I'm saying you only think listening doesn't count if you think reading is hard

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I read and listen to books, it counts but it's way less effort to listen to audiobooks imo. I don't think readers are wrong in saying there's a huge distinction, they're not saying you have to suffer through reading just both are on another level :marseyfluffy:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.