Please feel free to mansplain your vote.
Who is the gayest (good) rDrama user?
- 115
- 60
Top Poster of the Day:
Thirtythirst4sissies
Current Registered Users: 28,722
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
/h/meta SETTINGS /h/meta LOG /h/meta MODS /h/meta EXILEES /h/meta FOLLOWERS /h/meta BLOCKERS
Current software version: c889144
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
We had an agreement where you'd pay me 1000dc if I proved you wrong and you welched on thay agreement when I proved you wrong.
that's what you did
!nooticers he's playing dumb
!slots200
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I don't believe that happened
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I disagreed with you with this comment
https://rdrama.net/post/229379/if-you-like-alex-jones-tell/5567019#context
And you replied that if I could prove you wrong then you'd pay me the dc.
I then proved you wrong with this comment
https://rdrama.net/post/229379/if-you-like-alex-jones-tell/5567171#context
!nooticers what's his word worth?
!slots200
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Here's the original bet:
I bet you 1000DC that Alex Jones was never talking about Epstein until after Epstein was arrested. That's true. He started talking about Epstein before the second arrest, sure, but that wasn't the bet
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
In the context of what was said we were both talking about the second arrest until you realized that was an untennable position and you moved the goal posts.
!nooticers i hereby warn you not to deal with this reneging bald-faced charalatan
!slots200
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh I see. You're not claiming that you proved Alex had predicted Epstein. You're using the ambiguous phrasing to say you won the bet, because I bet you a thousand DC that if you could prove me wrong, I would pay you.
I'll agree that it's my fault for not better phrasing my bet and pay you the 1000 DC.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It wasn't ambiguous phrasing you just moved the goalposts lmao
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's clear from the context that I was meaning "prove Alex was talking about Epstein before he was ever arrested and I'll pay 1000DC".
@butthole caught me in a technicality with my phrasing where I'd have to pay out even if he corrected me on a spelling error.
That's why I paid out, r-slur.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's not a technicality. You whole-butt said before the second arrest. You wrote a full, clear sentence that you're now claiming is not at all what you meant. You weren't weaseled out of a win and nothing they did was cheap. You're either lying about your original intent or you're so incredibly r-slurred that you're incapable of writing a basic sentence that indicates what you mean.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
!slots100
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
!nooticers he paid
!slots400
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Happy ending
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
remember that bet I won against you? i think it was for.... ten trillion dc
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!slots200
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context