https://rdrama.net/h/braincels/post/245417/requirements-to-join-incels/5929042#context
Incel moids of rdrama post their Ls and show why they are so mad all the time.
Krayon sexually assaulted his sister. 
- 273
- 108
Top Poster of the Day:
hohomothyX2
Current Registered Users: 28,758
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
HOLES
PING GROUPS
/h/meta SETTINGS /h/meta LOG /h/meta MODS /h/meta EXILEES /h/meta FOLLOWERS /h/meta BLOCKERS
Current software version: 0c40c50
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The reason is because it isn't actually an issue, it's a personal problem.
Quit trying to get society to solve personal problems. Not everyone is ment to reproduce, that's why it's called natural selection
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Hordes of disenfranchised men are not a personal problem. Simply look to history if you want to see what will happen if this problem is left untreated.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
examples? can't think of any large events driven by ugly people with social anxiety
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/china/2011/05/13/chinas-growing-problem-of-too-many-single-men/
https://www.ips-journal.eu/regions/global/s*x-ratio-imbalances-have-grim-consequences-for-societies-4829/
https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2006/aug/too-many-men-could-destabilise-society
Does it not just make sense if you think about it for more than 5 seconds? Do you really think men will just be content to act as worker bees while living lives of isolation, or do you think they will eventually realize they have nothing to lose?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
those aren't historical events r-slur
yes it makes sense. i give one incel a gf he will happily social worker the rest of you
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Unironic rightoid agenda posters are the dumbest people on this site and impossible to have a real conversation with at this point.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
don't know what you're talking about so i'll show you how i see it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Why are you clinging so much to the "history" factor (those studies are history r-slur, some are over 10 years old at this point) and not the dangers of large disenfranchised populations of men? You are more nitpicky than a redditor lol. If I had the coin for it I would ping !ret*rds for you just so you could be with your kind.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
and again
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
disenfranchised? not sticking your peepee in kitty is disenfranchisment.
They will learn to get laid or die alone, either way society is better off
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No they will stop contributing to society at best, or actively work against it at worse. This is not a small problem. A majority of young men are sexless at this point and there will be consequences.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ohhhh now we better help them get laid or else.
I'm sure society is quaking in it's boots!
Have you offered your bussy to these young men? You know, to help stop this epic catastrophy
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes. Just look at India or China if you want to see what could happen.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context