One thing about my posts, is that they are designed to trigger those on the extremes of both political spectrums, only chuds are getting triggered by them. A lot of my posts could just as easily trigger lefties without a single change because they are well-informed, rational and I develop them based on evidence.
The userbase of the site is too unbalanced, and to balance the site then we need to do a recruitment drive to bring super leftwing people to the site. This site is not supposed to be a hugbox.
I think we should hold an rdrama recruitment drive to attract ultra-leftwing radicals onto the site to balance out the chuddiness.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
world's most resilient leftoid
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Having s*x with a child and exploiting someone vulnerable is one of the most heinous accusations I can think of, it can lead to real life consequences and I differ from you in that I don't believe it should be taken lightly.
I could actually file a civil suit and get the site into legal trouble if I did experience any real life consequences from unhinged rightoids throwing false accusations of a criminal offense around and I think because of that then they really shouldn't be taken lightly. It's a criminal offense if I experienced any legal consequences from false accusations.
I'm not threatening to sue the site, but if I did experience real life consequences because people are neurodivergent and called anything they disagreed with pedophilia, I would do whatever I could to clear my reputation and rid myself from that label.
Are you fricking r-slurred to think of pedophilia on the same line as "toddler bantz"?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
lmao p-do
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There should really be a rule against false pedophilia accusations, my reasoning is in the post above and people can't stop being absolutely fricking r-slurred. I'm just saying that it's something that could get the site into legal trouble if someone experienced real life consequences from unhinged rightoids making false accusations of a serious criminal offense.
I know free speech but you should weigh legal liability and the fact that the userbase is clinically r-slurred and someone is going to unironically believe something and take things too far.
It does ruin the site having unironic p-dophiles that think they are in good company making light of pedophilia, and think that making false p-dophile accusations are in good taste.
I want this site to be p-dophile free and the p-dophiles should be purged.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!dramatards another femoid reees about legal action
against rdrama
!metashit
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm just saying if someone experiences real life consequences from an r-slur spamming false accusations of possible the most heinous criminal offense, it could get the site into legal trouble and it's something that really should be enforced.
If I experienced real life consequences and had the label of p-dophile falsely attributed to me, I would do whatever I could to rid myself of it.
People may not think pedophilia is a huge deal because they have normalized their own thoughts, but in my country, it's a pretty big deal.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
maybe just turn your computer off or something
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Cite any case law that supports that, because it is unequivocally false. You CANNOT hold a site responsible for user actions. Its the entire reason fb, Twitter
et all ceos aren't arrested 
for CP
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's called defamation.
It is was falsely published that I was a p-dophile, a criminal offense without proof, I lost a job, I would be able to take legal action against the site in the US for damages. Free speech does have limits when it comes to defamation.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You cannot sue a website. Website owners are specifically shielded from user actions. You can have a lawyer
subpoena rdrama 
for user info but that literally 
would 
never 
happen 
lmfao. Sorry 
not sorry 
but you're delusional
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Hey. Quit being a cute twink.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Sorry
chud, you're owned 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context